Cited by 35Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Comparison of an AI Chatbot With a Nurse Hotline in Reducing Anxiety and Depression Levels in the General Population: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Chen, Chen, Lam, Kok Tai, Yip, Ka Man, So, Hung Kwan, Lum, Terry Yat Sang, Wong, Ian Chi Kei, Yam, Jason C, Chui, Celine Sze Ling +1 more·2025·JMIR Human Factors

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have been customized to deliver on-demand support for people with mental health problems. However, the effectiveness of AI chatbots in tackling mental health problems among the general public in Hong Kong remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to develop a local AI chatbot and compare the effectiveness of the AI chatbot with a conventional nurse hotline in reducing the level of anxiety and depression among individuals in Hong Kong. Methods: This study was a pilot randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2022 to March 2023, involving 124 participants allocated randomly (1:1 ratio) into the AI chatbot and nurse hotline groups. Among these, 62 participants in the AI chatbot group and 41 in the nurse hotline group completed both the pre- and postquestionnaires, including the GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and satisfaction questionnaire. Comparisons were conducted using independent and paired sample t tests (2-tailed) and the χ2 test to analyze changes in anxiety and depression levels. Results: Compared to the mean baseline score of 5.13 (SD 4.623), the mean postdepression score in the chatbot group was 3.68 (SD 4.397), which was significantly lower (P=.008). Similarly, a reduced anxiety score was also observed after the chatbot test (pre vs post: mean 4.74, SD 4.742 vs mean 3.4, SD 3.748; P=.005), respectively. No significant differences were found in the pre-post scores for either depression (P=.38) or anxiety (P=.19). No statistically significant difference was observed in service satisfaction between the two platforms (P=.32). Conclusions: The AI chatbot was comparable to the traditional nurse hotline in alleviating participants' anxiety and depression after responding to inquiries. Moreover, the AI chatbot has shown potential in alleviating short-term anxiety and depression compared to the nurse hotline. While the AI chatbot presents a promising solution for offering accessible strategies to the public, more extensive randomized controlled studies are necessary to further validate its effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/65785

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Romanovskyi O Pidbutska N Knysh A Elomia chatbot: the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in the fight for mental health Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems (COLINS 2021) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems 2021 1215 1224 URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:235271819 Accessed 17-07-2024

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C., Lam, K. T., Yip, K. M., So, H. K., Lum, T. Y. S., Wong, I. C. K., Yam, J. C., Chui, C. S. L., & Ip, P.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Ip, Patrick
Venue
JMIR Human Factors
Published
2025-03-06
Volume
12
Pages
e65785-e65785
ISSN
2292-9495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408180360
Cited by
35
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 11
FWCI
28.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Human Factors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
AI chatbots, anxiety, depression, mental health support, general population, service satisfaction, Hong Kong
MeSH terms
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Adult, Anxiety, Artificial Intelligence, Depression, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hotlines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review