Cited by 43Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Improved Diabetes Care Management Through a Text-Message Intervention for Low-Income Patients: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study

Open access
Watterson, Jessica L, Rodriguez, Hector P, Shortell, Stephen M, Aguilera, Adrian·2018·JMIR Diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major contributor to global death and disability. Text-messaging interventions hold promise for improving diabetes outcomes through better knowledge and self-management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the implementation and impact of a diabetes text-messaging program targeted primarily for low-income Latino patients receiving care at 2 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). METHODS: A mixed-methods, quasi-experimental research design was employed for this pilot study. A total of 50 Spanish or English-speaking adult patients with diabetes attending 2 FQHC sites in Los Angeles from September 2015 to February 2016 were enrolled in a 12-week, bidirectional text-messaging program. A comparison group (n=160) was constructed from unexposed, eligible patients. Demographic data and pre/post clinical indicators were compared for both the groups. Propensity score weighting was used to reduce selection bias, and over-time differences in clinical outcomes between groups were estimated using individual fixed-effects regression models. Population-averaged linear models were estimated to assess differential effects of patient engagement on each clinical indicator among the intervention participants. A sample of intervention patients (n=11) and all implementing staff (n=8) were interviewed about their experiences with the program. Qualitative data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed to identify common themes. RESULTS: , relative to patients who were less engaged, controlling for demographic characteristics (P<.001). Qualitative analyses revealed that many participants felt supported, as though "someone was worrying about [their] health." Participants also cited learning new information, setting new goals, and receiving helpful reminders. Staff and patients highlighted strategies to improve the program, including incorporating patient responses into in-person clinical care and tailoring the messages to patient knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: . Patients who were more engaged demonstrated greater improvement. Program improvements, such as linkages to clinical care, hold potential for improving patient engagement and ultimately, improving clinical outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/diabetes.8645

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphone ubiquity makes digital health interventions valuable in resource-limited or geographically remote settings.

    “Smartphone ubiquity makes DHIs valuable in resource-limited or geographically remote settings (32).”

    From The effectiveness of digital health intervention on glycemic control and physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion (Principal Findings and Comparison With Prior Findings; page unavailable) says text messaging made diabetes education more feasible for a resource-limited clinic by reaching many patients at once. The paper does not establish smartphone ubiquity or address geographically remote settings; its intervention used text messages in a low-income clinic population. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [3]Beckles GL Chou CF Disparities in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes: United States, 1999-2002 and 2011-2014 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016 11 18 65 45 1265 69 10.15585/mmwr.mm6545a4 27855140 27855140 · DOI
  2. [4]Stevens CD Schriger DL Raffetto B Davis AC Zingmond D Roby DH Geographic clustering of diabetic lower-extremity amputations in low-income regions of California Health Aff (Millwood) 2014 08 33 8 1383 90 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0148 25092840 33/8/1383 25092840 PMC4242846 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Arambepola C Ricci-Cabello I Manikavasagam P Roberts N French DP Farmer A The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials J Med Internet Res 2016 18 4 e86 10.2196/jmir.5425 27095386 v18i4e86 27095386 PMC4873307 · DOI
  4. [8]Fortmann AL Gallo LC Garcia MI Taleb M Euyoque JA Clark T Skidmore J Ruiz M Dharkar-Surber S Schultz J Philis-Tsimikas A Dulce Digital: an mHealth SMS-based intervention improves glycemic control in Hispanics with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2017 10 40 10 1349 55 10.2337/dc17-0230 28600309 dc17-0230 28600309 PMC5606313 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [9]Buis LR Hirzel L Turske SA Des Jardins TR Yarandi H Bondurant P Use of a text message program to raise type 2 diabetes risk awareness and promote health behavior change (part II): assessment of participants' perceptions on efficacy J Med Internet Res 2013 15 12 e282 10.2196/jmir.2929 24356359 v15i12e282 24356359 PMC3875890 · DOI
  6. [11]Nundy S Mishra A Hogan P Lee SM Solomon MC Peek ME How do mobile phone diabetes programs drive behavior change? Evidence from a mixed methods observational cohort study Diabetes Educ 2014 40 6 806 19 10.1177/0145721714551992 25278512 0145721714551992 25278512 PMC4492449 · DOI
  7. [12]Nelson LA Mulvaney SA Gebretsadik T Ho Y Johnson KB Osborn CY Disparities in the use of a mHealth medication adherence promotion intervention for low-income adults with type 2 diabetes J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 01 23 1 12 8 10.1093/jamia/ocv082 26186935 ocv082 26186935 PMC5009937 · DOI
  8. [13]Humble JR Tolley EA Krukowski RA Womack CR Motley TS Bailey JE Use of and interest in mobile health for diabetes self-care in vulnerable populations J Telemed Telecare 2016 01 22 1 32 8 10.1177/1357633X15586641 26026179 1357633X15586641 26026179 · DOI
  9. [14]Burner ER Menchine MD Kubicek K Robles M Arora S Perceptions of successful cues to action and opportunities to augment behavioral triggers in diabetes self-management: qualitative analysis of a mobile intervention for low-income Latinos with diabetes J Med Internet Res 2014 16 1 e25 10.2196/jmir.2881 24476784 v16i1e25 24476784 PMC3936269 · DOI
  10. [15]Philis-Tsimikas A Fortmann A Lleva-Ocana L Walker C Gallo LC Peer-led diabetes education programs in high-risk Mexican Americans improve glycemic control compared with standard approaches: a Project Dulce promotora randomized trial Diabetes Care 2011 09 34 9 1926 31 10.2337/dc10-2081 21775748 dc10-2081 21775748 PMC3161298 · DOI
  11. [17]McGuire BE Morrison TG Hermanns N Skovlund S Eldrup E Gagliardino J Kokoszka A Matthews D Pibernik-Okanović M Rodr&iacute;guez-Salda&ntilde;a J De Wit M Snoek FJ Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1 Diabetologia 2010 01 53 1 66 9 10.1007/s00125-009-1559-5 19841892 19841892 · DOI
  12. [18]Rubin D Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys 1987 New York, NY Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
  13. [20]Ray KK Seshasai SR Wijesuriya S Sivakumaran R Nethercott S Preiss D Erqou S Sattar N Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Lancet 2009 05 23 373 9677 1765 72 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60697-8 19465231 S0140-6736(09)60697-8 19465231 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watterson, J. L., Rodriguez, H. P., Shortell, S. M., & Aguilera, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Watterson, Jessica L
Venue
JMIR Diabetes
Published
2018-10-30
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
e15
ISSN
2371-4379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899258524
Cited by
43
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of California Berkeley
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
diabetes care management, text messaging intervention, low-income patients, Hispanic patients, federally qualified health centers, patient engagement, diabetes self-management, patient-provider communication, clinical outcomes, mobile health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review