Cited by 62Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Qualitative Feedback From a Text Messaging Intervention for Depression: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Cultural Differences

Open access
Aguilera, Adrian, Berridge, Clara·2014·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile health interventions are often standardized and assumed to work the same for all users; however, we may be missing cultural differences in the experiences of interventions that may impact how and if an intervention is effective. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess qualitative feedback from participants to determine if there were differences between Spanish speakers and English speakers. Daily text messages were sent to patients as an adjunct to group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for depression. METHODS: Messages inquired about mood and about specific themes (thoughts, activities, social interactions) of a manualized group CBT intervention. There were thirty-nine patients who participated in the text messaging pilot study. The average age of the participants was 53 years (SD 10.4; range of 23-72). RESULTS: Qualitative feedback from Spanish speakers highlighted feelings of social support, whereas English speakers noted increased introspection and self-awareness of their mood state. CONCLUSIONS: These cultural differences should be explored further, as they may impact the effect of supportive mobile health interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01083628; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01083628 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6StpbdHuq).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mhealth.3660

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Text messaging reminders have proven effective in increasing treatment adherence among POC community samples, including those in app-based mindfulness meditation studies.

    “Text messaging reminders have proven effective in increasing treatment adherence among POC community samples [54-56,63], including those in app-based mindfulness meditation studies [49].”

    From App-Based Mindfulness Meditation for People of Color Who Experience Race-Related Stress: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Methods (page unavailable) describe therapy-session and optional medication reminders in a depression-treatment group that included Latino and African American patients. In Results, Table 2 (page unavailable), respondents rated whether messages made them more likely to attend sessions highly, but this is self-reported likelihood, not proof that reminders increased treatment adherence. The app-based mindfulness clause has a separate citation and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aguilera, A., & Berridge, C.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
e46
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121833483
Cited by
62
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH094442)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (L60 MD003465)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression, text messaging intervention, mobile health, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, cultural differences, Spanish speakers, English speakers, social support, mood tracking, self-awareness, participant feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review