Cited by 31Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSocial Media in Health Education

Content and Functionality of Alcohol and Other Drug Websites: Results of an Online Survey

Open access
Klein, Britt, White, Angela, Kavanagh, David, Shandley, Kerrie, Kay-Lambkin, Frances, Proudfoot, Judith, Drennan, Judy, Connor, Jason +2 more·2010·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a growing trend for individuals to seek health information from online sources. Alcohol and other drug (AOD) use is a significant health problem worldwide, but access and use of AOD websites is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate content and functionality preferences for AOD and other health websites. METHODS: An anonymous online survey examined general Internet and AOD-specific usage and search behaviors, valued features of AOD and health-related websites (general and interactive website features), indicators of website trustworthiness, valued AOD website tools or functions, and treatment modality preferences. RESULTS: Surveys were obtained from 1214 drug (n = 766) and alcohol website users (n = 448) (mean age 26.2 years, range 16-70). There were no significant differences between alcohol and drug groups on demographic variables, Internet usage, indicators of website trustworthiness, or on preferences for AOD website functionality. A robust website design/navigation, open access, and validated content provision were highly valued by both groups. While attractiveness and pictures or graphics were also valued, high-cost features (videos, animations, games) were minority preferences. Almost half of respondents in both groups were unable to readily access the information they sought. Alcohol website users placed greater importance on several AOD website tools and functions than did those accessing other drug websites: online screening tools (χ²(2) = 15.8, P < .001, n = 985); prevention programs (χ²(2) = 27.5, P < .001, n = 981); tracking functions (χ²(2) = 11.5, P = .003, n = 983); self help treatment programs (χ²(2) = 8.3, P = .02, n = 984); downloadable fact sheets for friends (χ²(2) = 11.6, P = .003, n = 981); or family (χ²(2) = 12.7, P = .002, n = 983). The most preferred online treatment option for both the user groups was an Internet site with email therapist support. Explorations of demographic differences were also performed. While gender did not affect survey responses, younger respondents were more likely to value interactive and social networking features, whereas downloading of credible information was most highly valued by older respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Significant deficiencies in the provision of accessible information on AOD websites were identified, an important problem since information seeking was the most common reason for accessing these websites, and, therefore, may be a key avenue for engaging website users in behaviour change. The few differences between AOD website users suggested that both types of websites may have similar features, although alcohol website users may more readily be engaged in screening, prevention and self-help programs, tracking change, and may value fact sheets more highly. While the sociodemographic differences require replication and clarification, these differences support the notion that the design and features of AOD websites should target specific audiences to have maximal impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1449

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, B., White, A., Kavanagh, D., Shandley, K., Kay-Lambkin, F., Proudfoot, J., Drennan, J., Connor, J., Baker, A., & Young, R.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Klein, Britt
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2010-12-19
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
e51
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024710395
Cited by
31
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
online health information seeking, website trustworthiness, online screening tool, prevention programs, social networking features, substance use disorders, health information access, interactive website
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Consumer Behavior, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Information Storage and Retrieval, Age Distribution, Substance-Related Disorders, Internet, Information Dissemination, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review