Cited by 351Mental Health Research TopicsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessment protocols in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Wen, Cheng K Fred, Schneider, Stefan, Stone, Arthur A, Spruijt-Metz, Donna·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile device-based ecological momentary assessment (mobile-EMA) is increasingly used to collect participants' data in real-time and in context. Although EMA offers methodological advantages, these advantages can be diminished by participant noncompliance. However, evidence on how well participants comply with mobile-EMA protocols and how study design factors associated with participant compliance is limited, especially in the youth literature. OBJECTIVE: To systematically and meta-analytically examine youth's compliance to mobile-EMA protocols and moderators of participant compliance in clinical and nonclinical settings. METHODS: Studies using mobile devices to collect EMA data among youth (age ≤18 years old) were identified. A systematic review was conducted to describe the characteristics of mobile-EMA protocols and author-reported factors associated with compliance. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the overall compliance across studies and to explore factors associated with differences in youths' compliance. RESULTS: This review included 42 unique studies that assessed behaviors, subjective experiences, and contextual information. Mobile phones were used as the primary mode of EMA data collection in 48% (20/42) of the reviewed studies. In total, 12% (5/42) of the studies used wearable devices in addition to the EMA data collection platforms. About half of the studies (62%, 24/42) recruited youth from nonclinical settings. Most (98%, 41/42) studies used a time-based sampling protocol. Among these studies, most (95%, 39/41) prompted youth 2-9 times daily, for a study length ranging from 2-42 days. Sampling frequency and study length did not differ between studies with participants from clinical versus nonclinical settings. Most (88%, 36/41) studies with a time-based sampling protocol defined compliance as the proportion of prompts to which participants responded. In these studies, the weighted average compliance rate was 78.3%. The average compliance rates were not different between studies with clinical (76.9%) and nonclinical (79.2%; P=.29) and studies that used only a mobile-EMA platform (77.4%) and mobile platform plus additional wearable devices (73.0%, P=.36). Among clinical studies, the mean compliance rate was significantly lower in studies that prompted participants 2-3 times (73.5%) or 4-5 times (66.9%) compared with studies with a higher sampling frequency (6+ times: 89.3%). Among nonclinical studies, a higher average compliance rate was observed in studies that prompted participants 2-3 times daily (91.7%) compared with those that prompted participants more frequently (4-5 times: 77.4%; 6+ times: 75.0%). The reported compliance rates did not differ by duration of EMA period among studies from either clinical or nonclinical settings. CONCLUSIONS: The compliance rate among mobile-EMA studies in youth is moderate but suboptimal. Study design may affect protocol compliance differently between clinical and nonclinical participants; including additional wearable devices did not affect participant compliance. A more consistent compliance-related result reporting practices can facilitate understanding and improvement of participant compliance with EMA data collection among youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.6641

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Liao Yue Skelton Kara Dunton Genevieve Bruening Meg A Systematic Review of Methods and Procedures Used in Ecological Momentary Assessments of Diet and Physical Activity Research in Youth: An Adapted STROBE Checklist for Reporting EMA Studies (CREMAS) J Med Internet Res 2016 06 21 18 6 e151 10.2196/jmir.4954 27328833 v18i6e151 27328833 PMC4933800 · DOI
  2. [50]Wen CK Bell B Spruijt-Metz D Goran MI Use of mobile health strategies for the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity Childhood Obesity: Causes, ConsequencesIntervention Approaches 2016 10 26 United States Taylor & Francis Group 431 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, C. K. F., Schneider, S., Stone, A. A., & Spruijt-Metz, D.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Wen, Cheng K Fred
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-04-26
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
e132
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2609643912
Cited by
350
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1521722)
  • University of Southern California
  • National Institutes of Health (U24OD023176)
  • Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG042407)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR066200)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT008330)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
participant compliance, youth, children and adolescents, mobile phone data collection, wearable devices, sampling frequency, informed consent
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Child, Data Collection, Humans, Patient Compliance, Research Design, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review