Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Measuring Users’ Receptivity Toward an Integral Intervention Model Based on mHealth Solutions for Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (m-RESIST): A Qualitative Study

Open access
Huerta-Ramos, Elena, Escobar-Villegas, Maria Soledad, Rubinstein, Katya, Unoka, Zsolt Szabolcs, Grasa, Eva, Hospedales, Margarita, Jääskeläinen, Erika, Rubio-Abadal, Elena +9 more·2016·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the theoretical potential of mHealth solutions in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, there remains a lack of technological tools in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the receptivity of patients, informal carers, and clinicians to a European integral intervention model focused on patients with persistent positive symptoms: Mobile Therapeutic Attention for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (m-RESIST). METHODS: Before defining the system requirements, a qualitative study of the needs of outpatients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia was carried out in Spain, Israel, and Hungary. We analyzed the opinions of patients, informal carers, and clinicians concerning the services originally intended to be part of the solution. A total of 9 focus groups (72 people) and 35 individual interviews were carried out in the 3 countries, using discourse analysis as the framework. RESULTS: A webpage and an online forum were perceived as suitable to get both reliable information on the disease and support. Data transmission by a smart watch (monitoring), Web-based visits, and instant messages (clinical treatment) were valued as ways to improve contact with clinicians. Alerts were appreciated as reminders of daily tasks and appointments. Avoiding stressful situations for outpatients, promoting an active role in the management of the disease, and maintaining human contact with clinicians were the main suggestions provided for improving the effectiveness of the solution. CONCLUSIONS: Positive receptivity toward m-RESIST services is related to its usefulness in meeting user needs, its capacity to empower them, and the possibility of maintaining human contact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mhealth.5716

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People can access a mental health app if they are not able to speak to someone in person about their concerns.

    “For example, people can access a mental health app if they are not able to speak to someone in person about their concerns [175].”

    From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Results (Suggestions for Improvement; page unavailable) say online visits could maintain contact when outpatients were unwilling or unable to visit clinicians. This supports remote contact as an alternative to an in-person visit, but the study concerns patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, not people generally, and does not specifically discuss being unable to speak in person about their concerns. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased locus of control (users feeling more ownership over their own health) is a facilitating factor in using DMHIs.

    “A facilitating factor in using DMHIs was whether the use of the intervention increased locus of control, meaning that users felt more ownership over their own health [14,84,95,124,174,175].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Have PT Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse Forum Qual Sozialforsch / Forum Qual Soc Res 2006 7 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huerta-Ramos, E., Escobar-Villegas, M. S., Rubinstein, K., Unoka, Z. S., Grasa, E., Hospedales, M., Jääskeläinen, E., Rubio-Abadal, E., Caspi, A., Bitter, I., Berdun, J., Seppälä, J., Ochoa, S., Fazekas, K., M-RESIST Group, Corripio, I., & Usall, J.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
  • TicSalut (ES)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2016-09-28
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e112
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2525448552
Cited by
20
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Semmelweis University Repository (Semmelweis University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
treatment-resistant schizophrenia, mobile health, patient receptivity, informal caregivers, clinicians, user needs, instant messaging, clinical alerts, patient empowerment, online support groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review