Cited by 45Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Life with FOCUS: A qualitative evaluation of the impact of a smartphone intervention on people with serious mental illness.

Open access
Jonathan, Geneva, Carpenter-Song, Elizabeth A., Brian, Rachel M., Ben-Zeev, Dror·2019·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A growing body of literature indicates that mobile health (mHealth) interventions that utilize smartphones for illness management are feasible, acceptable, and clinically promising. In this study, we examine how individuals with serious mental illness use a mHealth intervention-FOCUS-to self-manage their illnesses. Additionally, we explored participant perceptions of the intervention's impact on their subjective illness experience. METHOD: We analyzed qualitative data from 30 individuals with serious mental illness who participated in 1 of 2 community-based, 3-month trials of FOCUS. In Study 1, weekly calls were conducted by a mHealth specialist to facilitate and enhance intervention use. In Study 2, researchers conducted qualitative interviews to gather detailed perspectives of intervention use. Data were sampled from the weekly call notes and qualitative interviews and analyzed using a thematic and collaborative approach. RESULTS: Thematic analyses revealed 6 recurring themes. Three themes emerged in regard to participants' ongoing daily use of FOCUS: "back-up" support, symptom management, and self-awareness. Another 3 themes emerged related to the intervention's impact on participants' recovery processes: acceptance of symptoms, motivation and supporting positive outlook. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This qualitative study offers insight into how individuals with serious mental illness made use of a mHealth intervention designed to support illness self-management. Our findings suggest that individuals may benefit differently from mHealth interventions depending on where they are in the recovery process. As mHealth interventions become increasingly popular in clinical settings, it is important to understand consumers' short-term and long-term benefits from these interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000337

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants expressed a need for more structured use of DMHIs (e.g., app reminders or a human coach checking on them regularly).

    “Participants expressed a need to receive more structured use, for example, through app reminders or a human coach checking on them on a regular basis [49,50,113,122,133,137,139,148,150,163,175-182].”

    From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [139]

    The Methods section (page unavailable) says FOCUS prompted daily use through notifications and that an mHealth specialist called participants weekly. The Discussion describes participants wanting tailored content and fresh material, but does not report that they expressed a need for more structured use, reminders, or regular coach check-ins. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 6 studies, users stated a preference for DMHI as a complement to existing in-person therapy rather than a replacement for in-person therapy.

    “In 6 studies, users stated that they would prefer if an intervention served as a complement to existing, in-person therapy rather than a replacement for in-person therapy [30,122,134,139,166,183].”
  • Increased insight into users' health could facilitate engagement.

    “Additional positive effects that could facilitate engagement were an increased insight into users’ health [79,84,114,124,134,138-140,158,176,202-205]”
  • Intervention normalizing people's experiences (e.g., by providing examples of other people with similar experiences) is a facilitating factor.

    “Another facilitating factor was whether the intervention normalized people’s experiences [79,139,157,190,201], for instance, by providing examples of other people with similar experiences.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonathan, G., Carpenter-Song, E. A., Brian, R. M., & Ben-Zeev, D.
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2019-06
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
182-189
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2907972569
Cited by
45
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CER-1403–11403)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH100195)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
severe mental illness, mobile health, smartphone-based intervention, illness self-management, recovery process, self-awareness, symptom management, participant perceptions, community-based intervention
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Self-Management, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review