PreprintCited by 36Homelessness and Social IssuesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Promote HIV Risk Reduction Behaviors Among Young Adults Experiencing Homelessness: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Open access
Santa Maria, Diane, Padhye, Nikhil, Businelle, Michael, Yang, Yijiong, Jones, Jennifer, Sims, Alexis, Lightfoot, Marguerita·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Preprint — published as 10.2196/26704 · Paper page

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People experiencing homelessness have higher rates of HIV than those who are stably housed. Mental health needs, substance use problems, and issues unique to homelessness such as lack of shelter and transiency need to be considered with regard to HIV prevention. To date, HIV prevention interventions for young adults experiencing homelessness have not specifically addressed modifiable real-time factors such as stress, sexual or drug use urge, or substance use, or been delivered at the time of heightened risk. Real-time, personalized HIV prevention messages may reduce HIV risk behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study tested the initial efficacy of an innovative, smartphone-based, just-in-time adaptive intervention that assessed predictors of HIV risk behaviors in real time and automatically provided behavioral feedback and goal attainment information. METHODS: A randomized attention control design was used among young adults experiencing homelessness, aged 18-25 years, recruited from shelters and drop-in centers in May 2019. Participants were randomized to either a control or an intervention group. The intervention (called MY-RID [Motivating Youth to Reduce Infection and Disconnection]) consisted of brief messages delivered via smartphone over 6 weeks in response to preidentified predictors that were assessed using ecological momentary assessments. Bayesian hierarchical regression models were used to assess intervention effects on sexual activity, drug use, alcohol use, and their corresponding urges. RESULTS: Participants (N=97) were predominantly youth (mean age 21.2, SD 2.1 years) who identified as heterosexual (n=51, 52%), male (n=56, 57%), and African American (n=56, 57%). Reports of sexual activity, drug use, alcohol use, stress, and all urges (ie, sexual, drug, alcohol) reduced over time in both groups. Daily drug use reduced by a factor of 13.8 times over 6 weeks in the intervention group relative to the control group (Multimedia Appendix 4). Lower urges for sex were found in the intervention group relative to the control group over the duration of the study. Finally, there was a statistically significant reduction in reports of feeling stressed the day before between the intervention and control conditions (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate promising intervention effects on drug use, stress, and urges for sex in a hard-to-reach, high-risk population. The MY-RID intervention should be further tested in a larger randomized controlled trial to further investigate its efficacy and impact on sexual risk behaviors. CLINICALTRIAL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03911024; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03911024

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/preprints.26704

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.006 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10578-011-0270-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1604 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/pch/16.6.e43 · DOI
  5. 10.2105/ajph.2009.182022 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10461-005-9000-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.023 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00205-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.010 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/088626000015003001 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.020 · DOI
  12. 10.2105/ajph.2008.142547 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1077559517733816 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/a0017218 · DOI
  15. 10.1089/apc.2011.0202 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/1533256x.2011.570219 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00475.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/002214650504600204 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00433.x · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05333.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.023 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00209-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1196/annals.1441.030 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.009 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/jsm.12607 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/13548506.2014.951369 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/09540121.2014.906548 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10461-012-0206-1 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.06.004 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/09540121.2016.1224303 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s10461-015-1083-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10508-014-0375-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/1524838015584371 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.008 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.037 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.05.015 · DOI
  37. 10.1353/hpu.2014.0124 · DOI
  38. 10.1186/s12889-015-1419-9 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10964-010-9524-7 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s10461-011-0017-9 · DOI
  41. 10.2196/publichealth.9020 · DOI
  42. 10.1521/aeap.15.4.269.23827 · DOI
  43. 10.1086/684107 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00223.x · DOI
  45. 10.1207/s15324796abm2403_09 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.2196/jmir.6641 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/add.12996 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/15332640.2014.986354 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/08897077.2014.970323 · DOI
  50. 10.1037/hea0000075 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s10508-011-9787-4 · DOI
  52. 10.1186/s12889-016-2876-5 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.017 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s13142-015-0324-1 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1080/00952990.2017.1407328 · DOI
  57. 10.2196/jmir.6058 · DOI
  58. 10.2196/jmir.6307 · DOI
  59. 10.1348/135910709x466063 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1002/14651858.cd006611 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1097/olq.0000000000000146 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/jamia/ocv043 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1089/cpb.2008.0156 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01646.x · DOI
  66. 10.2196/jmir.1858 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.2196/mhealth.7199 · DOI
  68. 10.1370/afm.1888 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003 · DOI
  70. 10.1055/s-0038-1638697 · DOI
  71. 10.2105/ajph.2013.301623 · DOI
  72. 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080049 · DOI
  73. 10.1080/09540121.2011.608788 · DOI
  74. 10.1037/a0025472 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1037/a0013022 · DOI
  76. 10.2196/jmir.1007 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.017 · DOI
  78. 10.1093/ntr/ntu088 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.jana.2010.11.007 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00308.x · DOI
  81. 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1093/sw/sww009 · DOI
  84. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1002/mpr.314 · DOI
  87. 10.1037/a0017074 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2008.05.002 · DOI
  89. 10.1002/sim.6197 · DOI
  90. 10.1002/jip.1473 · DOI
  91. 10.2196/11130 · DOI
  92. 10.1002/14651858.cd007501.pub2 · DOI
  93. 10.1023/a:1024697706033 · DOI
  94. 10.1007/s10865-007-9132-5 · DOI
  95. 10.1081/ada-47916 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Santa Maria, D., Padhye, N., Businelle, M., Yang, Y., Jones, J., Sims, A., & Lightfoot, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
e26704-e26704
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178336646
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (R21-02)
  • Stephenson Cancer Center (#P30CA225520)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA225520)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
just-in-time adaptive interventions, HIV prevention, HIV risk reduction, smartphone-based intervention, ecological momentary assessment, sexual urges, alcohol consumption, stress, sexual risk behavior, behavioral feedback, homeless shelters, substance use, HIV prevention messaging, Bayesian hierarchical regression, hard-to-reach populations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, HIV Infections, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review