Cited by 151Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

A Text Message Alcohol Intervention for Young Adult Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Suffoletto, Brian, Kristan, Jeffrey, Callaway, Clifton, Kim, Kevin H., Chung, Tammy, Monti, Peter M., Clark, Duncan B.·2014·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Study objective Opportunistic brief in-person emergency department (ED) interventions can be effective at reducing hazardous alcohol use in young adult drinkers, but require resources frequently unavailable. Mobile telephone text messaging (short message service [SMS]) could sustainably deliver behavioral support to young adult patients, but efficacy remains unknown. We report 3-month outcome data of a randomized controlled trial testing a novel SMS-delivered intervention in hazardous-drinking young adults. Methods We randomized 765 young adult ED patients who screened positive for past hazardous alcohol use to one of 3 groups: SMS assessments+feedback (SA+F) intervention who were asked to respond to drinking-related queries and received real-time feedback through SMS each Thursday and Sunday for 12 weeks (n=384), SMS assessments (SA) who were asked to respond to alcohol consumption queries each Sunday but did not receive any feedback (N=196), and a control group who did not participate in any SMS (n=185). Primary outcomes were self-reported number of binge drinking days and number of drinks per drinking day in the past 30 days, collected by Web-based timeline follow-back method and analyzed with regression models. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants with weekend binge episodes and most drinks consumed per drinking occasion during 12 weekends, collected by SMS. Results With Web-based data, there were decreases in the number of self-reported binge drinking days from baseline to 3 months in the SA+F group (-0.51 [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.10 to -0.95]), whereas there were increases in the SA group (0.90 [95% CI 0.23 to 1.6]) and the control group (0.41 [95% CI -0.20 to 1.0]). There were also decreases in the number of self-reported drinks per drinking day from baseline to 3 months in the SA+F group (-0.31 [95% CI -0.07 to -0.55]), whereas there were increases in the SA group (0.10 [95% CI -0.27 to 0.47]) and the control group (0.39 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.72]). With SMS data, there was a lower mean proportion of SA+F participants reporting a weekend binge during 12 weeks (30.5% [95% CI 25% to 36%) compared with the SA participants (47.7% [95% CI 40% to 56%]). There was also a lower mean drinks consumed per weekend during 12 weeks in the SA+F group (3.2 [95% CI 2.6 to 3.7]) compared to the SA group (4.8 [95% CI 4.0 to 5.6]). Conclusion A text message intervention can produce small reductions in self-reported binge drinking and the number of drinks consumed per drinking day in hazardous-drinking young adults after ED discharge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.010

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]Rueger SY Trela CJ Palmeri M King AC Self-administered web-based timeline followback procedure for drinking and smoking behaviors in young adults J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012 9 73 5 829 3 22846247 PMC3410950

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suffoletto, B., Kristan, J., Callaway, C., Kim, K. H., Chung, T., Monti, P. M., & Clark, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Suffoletto, Brian
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
664-672.e4
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139415566
Cited by
151
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23AA023284, K02AA018195, P01AA019072, K05AA019681, R01AA016482)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50-DA 05605, P50DA005605)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
text messaging intervention, mobile health, young adults, hazardous drinking, binge drinking, emergency department, brief alcohol intervention, real-time feedback, alcohol consumption monitoring, weekend drinking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholic Intoxication, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Young Adult, Text Messaging, Binge Drinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review