Cited by 161Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsRenal and Vascular PathologiesPeripheral Artery Disease Management

Significant disease of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries in asymptomatic patients: predictive value of Doppler sonography.

Roobottom, C A, Dubbins, P A·1993·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of significant disease (i.e., occlusion or stenosis > 70%) of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries in asymptomatic patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using duplex sonographic criteria obtained from previous angiographic-duplex Doppler correlation studies, we assessed the frequency of significant disease in the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries in 184 patients who had no signs or symptoms of mesenteric ischemia. RESULTS: For patients less than 65 years old, the frequency of significant disease was 3%, and it was isolated to the celiac artery. Significant disease was found in 18% of patients more than 65 years old (in 11%, isolated to one vessel; in 7%, disease of both vessels). Single-vessel disease was more common in the celiac artery (81%) than in the superior mesenteric artery (19%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the finding of significant abnormality of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries on Doppler sonograms does not necessarily indicate mesenteric ischemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.161.5.8273642

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of asymptomatic chronic stenotic mesenteric disease varied from 3% (below the age of 65 years) to 18% (above the age of 65 years) on doppler sonography in some studies.

    “Although the prevalence of asymptomatic chronic stenotic mesenteric disease varied from 3% (below the age of 65 years) to 18% (above the age of 65 years) on doppler sonography in some studies[34], the incidence of CMI is low as mentioned before.”

    From Ischemic bowel disease in 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roobottom, C. A., & Dubbins, P. A.
Affiliations
Derriford Hospital (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1993-11
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
985-988
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2164705503
Cited by
161
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Roentgenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Keywords
celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, mesenteric ischemia, asymptomatic patients, arterial stenosis, arterial occlusion, Doppler ultrasound, duplex ultrasound, predictive value, age-related risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Blood Flow Velocity, Celiac Artery, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Ischemia, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Mesentery, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Mesenteric Artery, Superior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review