Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepcidin—A Potential Novel Biomarker for Iron Status in Chronic Kidney Disease

Open access
Zaritsky, Joshua, Young, Brian, Wang, He-Jing, Westerman, Mark, Olbina, Gordana, Nemeth, Elizabeta, Ganz, Tomas, Rivera, Seth, Nissenson, Allen R., Salusky, Isidro B.·2009·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hepcidin is a key regulator of iron homeostasis, but its study in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been hampered by the lack of validated serum assays. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study reports the first measurements of bioactive serum hepcidin using a novel competitive ELISA in 48 pediatric (PCKD2-4) and 32 adult (ACKD2-4) patients with stages 2 to 4 CKD along with 26 pediatric patients with stage 5 CKD (PCKD5D) on peritoneal dialysis. RESULTS: When compared with their respective controls (pediatric median = 25.3 ng/ml, adult = 72.9 ng/ml), hepcidin was significantly increased in PCKD2-4 (127.3 ng/ml), ACKD2-4 (269.9 ng/ml), and PCKD5D (652.4 ng/ml). Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between hepcidin and indicators of anemia, iron status, inflammation, and renal function. In PCKD2-4 (R(2) = 0.57), only ferritin correlated with hepcidin. In ACKD2-4 (R(2) = 0.78), ferritin and soluble transferrin receptor were associated with hepcidin, whereas GFR was inversely correlated. In PCKD5D (R(2) = 0.52), percent iron saturation and ferritin were predictors of hepcidin. In a multivariate analysis that incorporated all three groups (R(2) = 0.6), hepcidin was predicted by ferritin, C-reactive protein, and whether the patient had stage 5D versus stages 2 to 4 CKD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that increased hepcidin across the spectrum of CKD may contribute to abnormal iron regulation and erythropoiesis and may be a novel biomarker of iron status and erythropoietin resistance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.05931108

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Zaritsky, J., Young, B., Wang, H.-J., Westerman, M., Olbina, G., Nemeth, E., Ganz, T., Rivera, S., Nissenson, A. R., & Salusky, I. B.
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2009-06
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
1051-1056
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128599675
Cited by
350
References
8
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepcidin—A Potential Novel Biomarker for Iron Status in Chronic Kidney Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2215/cjn.05931108
The paper
Zaritsky, J., Young, B., Wang, H.-J., Westerman, M., Olbina, G., Nemeth, E., Ganz, T., Rivera, S., Nissenson, A. R., & Salusky, I. B. (2009). Hepcidin—A Potential Novel Biomarker for Iron Status in Chronic Kidney Disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.05931108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.