The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organ Printing: Promises and Challenges
Abstract
Organ printing or biomedical application of rapid prototyping, also defined as additive layer-by-layer biomanufacturing, is an emerging transforming technology that has potential for surpassing traditional solid scaffold-based tissue engineering. Organ printing has certain advantages: it is an automated approach that offers a pathway for scalable reproducible mass production of tissue engineered products; it allows a precised simultaneous 3D positioning of several cell types; it enables creation tissue with a high level of cell density; it can solve the problem of vascularization in thick tissue constructs; finally, organ printing can be done in situ. The ultimate goal of organ-printing technology is to fabricate 3D vascularized functional living human organs suitable for clinical implantation. The main practical outcomes of organ-printing technology are industrial scalable robotic biofabrication of complex human tissues and organs, automated tissue-based in vitro assays for clinical diagnostics, drug discovery and drug toxicity, and complex in vitro models of human diseases. This article describes conceptual framework and recent developments in organ-printing technology, outlines main technological barriers and challenges, and presents potential future practical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fedorovich, N. E., Alblas, J., de Wijn, J. R., Hennink, W. E., Verbout, A. J., & Dhert, W. J. A. (2007) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0175 · Cited by 467 · cited 4×
“, who also claimed that [15]:”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Hydrogels in regenerative medicine
Slaughter, B. V., Khurshid, S. S., Fisher, O. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Peppas, N. A. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200802106 · Cited by 2,703
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
Organ printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks
Mironov, V., Visconti, R. P., Kasyanov, V., Forgacs, G., Drake, C. J., & Markwald, R. R. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084 · Cited by 1,238
Self-citationFedorovich, N. E., Alblas, J., de Wijn, J. R., Hennink, W. E., Verbout, A. J., & Dhert, W. J. A. (2007) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0175 · Cited by 467
Skardal, A., Devarasetty, M., Kang, H.-W., Mead, I., Bishop, C., Shupe, T., Lee, S. J., Jackson, J., Yoo, J., Soker, S., et al. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.030 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Mironov, V., Kasyanov, V., Drake, C., & Markwald, R. R.
- Venue
- Regenerative Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12-21
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-103
- ISSN
- 1746-0751 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-076X
- OpenAlex
- W2131832764
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organ Printing: Promises and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2217/17460751.3.1.93
- The paper
- Mironov, V., Kasyanov, V., Drake, C., & Markwald, R. R. (2008). Organ Printing: Promises and Challenges. Regenerative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.1.93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.