Cited by 502Mental Health and Patient InvolvementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice

Open access

Esmail, Laura, Moore, Emily, Rein, Alison·2015·Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite the growing demand for research that engages stakeholders, there is limited evidence in the literature to demonstrate its value – or return on investment. This gap indicates a general lack of evaluation of engagement activities. To adequately inform engagement activities, we need to further investigate the dividends of engaged research, and how to evaluate these effects. This paper synthesizes the literature on hypothesized impacts of engagement, shares what has been evaluated and identifies steps needed to reduce the gap between engagement's promises and the underlying evidence supporting its practice. This assessment provides explicit guidance for better alignment of engagement's promised benefits with evaluation efforts and identifies specific areas for development of evaluative measures and better reporting processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/cer.14.79

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243904271724 · Cited by 1,860
Patient And Family Engagement: A Framework For Understanding The Elements And Developing Interventions And Policies
Carman, K. L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M. E., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133 · Cited by 1,770
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x · Cited by 1,598
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409
Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment
Charlton, J. I. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0640 · Cited by 1,124
Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility
Greenwood, M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y · Cited by 1,061
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes
Abelson, J., Forest, P., Eyles, J. D., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00343-x · Cited by 983
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E. M., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D. M., Rhodes, S. D., Samuel‐Hodge, C. D., Maty, S. C., Lux, L. J., et al. (2004) · PubMed Central · Cited by 959
Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2004) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243903259197 · Cited by 882
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework
Shippee, N. D., Garces, J. P. D., López, G., Wang, Z., Elraiyah, T. A., Nabhan, M., Brito, J. P., Boehmer, K. B., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., et al. (2013) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12090 · Cited by 630

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 68 references

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Krumholz H . National priorities and research agenda . In : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute National Patient and Stakeholder Dialogue . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute , Washington, DC, USA ( 2012 ).
Garces JPD , Lopez GJP , Wang Z Eliciting Patient Perspective in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: a Meta Narrative Systematic Review . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) , Washington, DC, USA , 1 – 163 ( 2012 ).
Mullins CD . Integrating Patients’ Voices in Study Design Elements with a Focus on Hard-to-reach Populations . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) , Washington, DC, USA ( 2012 ).
Nass PL , Levine S , Yancy C . Methods for Involving Patients in Topic Generation for Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research – an International Perspective . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) , Washington, DC, USA ( 2012 ).

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 502

Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research
Micsinszki, S. K., Tanel, N. L., Kowal, J., King, G. A., Menna‐Dack, D., Chu, A., & Phoenix, M. P. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00398-y · Cited by 27
People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression: describing and reflecting on an explicit patient engagement process within depression research priority setting in Alberta, Canada
Breault, L. J., Rittenbach, K., Hartle, K. D., Babins‐Wagner, R., de Beaudrap, C., Jasaui, Y., Ardell, E., Purdon, S. E., Michael, A., Sullivan, G., et al. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1 · Cited by 27
Network Engagement in Action
Poger, J. M., Mayer, V., Duru, O. K., Nauman, B., Holderness, H., Warren, N., Vasquez, C., Bibi, S., Rasmussen‐Torvik, L. J., Hosseinian, Z., et al. (2020) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001264 · Cited by 26
Ethical challenges for a new generation of early-phase pediatric gene therapy trials
Iyer, A. A., Saade, D. N., Bharucha-Goebel, D. X., Foley, A. R., Averion, G. V., Paredes, E., Gray, S. J., Bönnemann, C. G., Grady, C., Hendriks, S., et al. (2021) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01245-3 · Cited by 29
Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers
Carlini, J., & Robertson, J. (2022) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/14707853221140748 · Cited by 26
A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research
Shahid, A., Lalani, I. N., Rosgen, B. K., Sept, B. G., Longmore, S., Leigh, J. P., Stelfox, H. T., & Fiest, K. M. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00405-2 · Cited by 32
Qualitative Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Vandermause, R., Barg, F., Esmail, L., Edmundson, L., Girard, S., & Perfetti, A. (2017) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732316668298 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Partnering with parents to advance child health research
Curran, J., Bishop, A., Chorney, J. M. L., MacEachern, L., & Mackay, R. (2018) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470417744568 · Cited by 26
Data and model bias in artificial intelligence for healthcare applications in New Zealand
Yogarajan, V., Dobbie, G., Leitch, S. V., Keegan, T. T., Bensemann, J., Witbrock, M., Asrani, V. M., & Reith, D. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2022.1070493 · Cited by 33
Stakeholder Involvement for Responsible AI Development: A Process Framework
Kallina, E., & Singh, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3689904.3694698 · Cited by 23
The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement
Petkovic, J., Magwood, O., Concannon, T. W., Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Lytvyn, L., Welch, V. A., Avey, M. T., Bhaumik, S., Gunn, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727 · Cited by 23
Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates—Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a ‘One Stop’ Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer
Bobridge, A., Price, K., Gill, T. K., & Taylor, A. W. (2017) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00308 · Cited by 25
“Still learning and evolving in our approaches”: patient and stakeholder engagement among Canadian community-based primary health care researchers
Kendall, C., Fitzgerald, M., Kang, R. S., Wong, S. T., Katz, A., Fortin, M., Dionne, É., Kuluski, K., O’Brien, M. A., Ploeg, J., et al. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0132-0 · Cited by 23
The experiences, priorities, and perceptions of informal caregivers of people with dementia in nursing homes: A scoping review
Harper, A. E., Terhorst, L. A., Moscirella, M., Turner, R. L., Piersol, C. V., & Leland, N. E. (2021) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012211012606 · Cited by 24
Co-design of Guidance for Patient and Public Involvement in Psychedelic Research
Close, J. B., Bornemann, J., Piggin, M., Jayacodi, S., Luan, L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Spriggs, M. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.727496 · Cited by 25
Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial
Hoke, A. M., Rosen, P., Pileggi, F., Molinari, A., & Sekhar, D. L. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00425-6 · Cited by 23
“[5] conducted a review of literature describing benefits of CEnR, proposing measurable components for process, context, and impact of engagement.”
Background
Patient perspectives on engagement in shared decision-making for asthma care
Tapp, H., Derkowski, D. M., Calvert, M., Welch, M., & Spencer, S. (2016) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmw122 · Cited by 23
Preliminary engagement of a patient advisory board of African American community members with type 2 diabetes in a peer-led medication adherence intervention
Shiyanbola, O. O., Kaiser, B. L., Thomas, G. R., & Tarfa, A. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00245-y · Cited by 23
Stakeholder Engagement in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Emphasizing Relationships to Improve Pain Management Delivery and Outcomes
Bastian, L. A., Cohen, S. P., Katsovich, L., Becker, W. C., Brummett, B. R., Burgess, D. J., Crunkhorn, A. E., Denneson, L. M., Frank, J. W., Goertz, C., et al. (2020) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa333 · Cited by 22
Development of the patient-oriented research curriculum in child health (PORCCH)
Macarthur, C., Walsh, C. M., Buchanan, F., Karoly, A., Pires, L., McCreath, G. A., & Jones, N. L. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00276-z · Cited by 21
Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata
Tomasi, S., Cavicchi, A., Aleffi, C., Paviotti, G., Ferrara, C., Baldoni, F., & Passarini, P. (2021) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-021-00185-5 · Cited by 22
Participatory governance over research in an academic research network: the case of Diabetes Action Canada
Willison, D. J., Trowbridge, J., Greiver, M., Keshavjee, K., Mumford, D., & Sullivan, F. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026828 · Cited by 22
PCORI Methodology Standards
(2017) · doi:10.25302/67.2017.3 · Cited by 23
Is Promotion of Mobility in Older Patients Hospitalized for Medical Illness a Physician’s Job?—An Interview Study with Physicians in Denmark
Pedersen, M., Brødsgaard, R., Nilsen, P., & Kirk, J. (2020) · Geriatrics · doi:10.3390/geriatrics5040074 · Cited by 11
Better Together
Barn, P. K., Rideout, K., Lo, W., Josey, D., Vint, Z., Sha, C., Hamilton, C. B., Hoens, A. M., Shellington, E. M., Joshi, P. B., et al. (2021) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.028 · Cited by 21
Patients as research partners in preference studies: learnings from IMI-PREFER
Smith, M. Y., Janssens, R., Jimenez‐Moreno, C., Cleemput, I., Muller, M., Oliveri, S., Simons, G., Strammiello, V., Huys, I., & Falahee, M. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00430-9 · Cited by 23
Working with children and young people in research: Supportive practices and pathways to impact
Thomas, C., Cockcroft, E., Jenkins, G., & Liabo, K. (2023) · Journal of Child Health Care · doi:10.1177/13674935231171451 · Cited by 22
Patients’ and researchers’ experiences with a patient board for a clinical trial on urinary tract infections
Schilling, I., Behrens, H., Bleidorn, J., Gágyor, I., Hugenschmidt, C., Jilani, H. S., Schmiemann, G., & Gerhardus, A. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0172-0 · Cited by 21
Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study
Lee, G. Y., McKenna, S., Song, Y. J. C., Hutcheon, A., Hockey, S. J., Laidler, R., Occhipinti, J., Perry, C., Lindsay‐Smith, T., Ramsay, A., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13777 · Cited by 18
Involving Latina/o parents in patient‐centered outcomes research: Contributions to research study design, implementation and outcomes
Jolles, M. P., Martínez, M., García, S. J., Stein, G. L., Mentor Parent Group Members, & Thomas, K. C. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12540 · Cited by 20
From research to international scale-up: stakeholder engagement essential in successful design, evaluation and implementation of paediatric HIV testing intervention
Mugo, C., Njuguna, I. N., Nduati, M., Omondi, V. O., Otieno, V. A., Nyapara, F., Mabele, E., Moraa, H., Sherr, K., Inwani, I. W., et al. (2020) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czaa089 · Cited by 20
A Smartphone App to Support Adherence to Inhaled Corticosteroids in Young Adults With Asthma: Multi-Methods Feasibility Study
Murphy, J., McSharry, J., Hynes, L., & Molloy, G. J. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/28784 · Cited by 20
Patient and family engagement in Alberta Health Services: Improving care delivery and research outcomes
Singh, S., Burns, K. K., Rees, J., Picklyk, D., Spence, J. D., & Marlett, N. J. (2018) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470417747003 · Cited by 20
Patient and Family Advisory Councils for Research
Harrison, J. D., Anderson, W. G., Fagan, M. B., Robinson, E. J., Schnipper, J. L., Symczak, G., Carnie, M. B., Hanson, C., Banta, J., Chen, S., et al. (2019) · JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/nna.0000000000000790 · Cited by 20
13. Forskning med nye aktører – forskningskvalitetog nytteverdi
Østensjø, S., & Askheim, O. P. (2019) · Universitetsforlaget eBooks · doi:10.18261/9788215031675-2019-14 · Cited by 20
Co-design of a patient experience survey for arthritis central intake: an example of meaningful patient engagement in healthcare design
Carr, E., Patel, J. N., Ortiz, M., Miller, J., Teare, S., Barber, C. E. H., & Marshall, D. A. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4196-9 · Cited by 19
Patient and public involvement in oesophageal cancer survivorship research
Schandl, A. R., Mälberg, K., Haglund, L., Arnberg, L., & Lagergren, P. (2021) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2021.2016950 · Cited by 19
PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A scoping review
Petkovic, J., Riddle, A. Y., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Akl, E. A., Welch, V. A., Magwood, O., Atwere, P., Graham, I. D., Grant, S., et al. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1242 · Cited by 19
National strategy on the integration of sleep and circadian rhythms into public health research and policies: Report from the Canadian Sleep and Circadian Network
Chaput, J., Gariépy, G., Pendharkar, S. R., Ayas, N., Samuels, C. H., Vallières, A., Davidson, J. R., Morin, C. M., Simonelli, G., Bourguinat, C., et al. (2022) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2022.06.005 · Cited by 20
Co-designing digital mental health interventions with young people: 10 recommendations from lessons learned in low-and-middle-income countries
Gonsalves, P. P., Ansari, S., Berry, C., Gonsalves, F., Iyengar, S., Kashyap, P., Mittal, D., Pal, S., Razdan, E., & Michelson, D. (2024) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/00178969241297821 · Cited by 21
Patient Engagement in Kidney Research: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead
Molnar, A. O., Barua, M., Konvalinka, A., & Schick‐Makaroff, K. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1177/2054358117740583 · Cited by 19
Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC)
Martínez, J., Piersol, C. V., Lucas, K., & Leland, N. E. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07029-4 · Cited by 18
PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis
Magwood, O., Riddle, A. Y., Petkovic, J., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Atwere, P., Akl, E. A., Campbell, P., Welch, V. A., Smith, M. P., et al. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1237 · Cited by 18
Public and Patient Involvement in Doctoral Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reflections on the Process, Challenges, Impact and Experiences From the Perspectives of Adults With Cerebral Palsy and the Doctoral Researcher
Manikandan, M., Foley, K. T., Gough, J., Harrington, S., Wall, É., Weldon, F., Ryan, J. M., Kerr, C., Walsh, A., & Fortune, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.874012 · Cited by 18
Using ethnographic approaches to document, evaluate, and facilitate virtual community-engaged implementation research
Rabin, B. A., Cain, K. L., Salgin, L., Watson, P., Oswald, W., Kaiser, B. N., Ayers, L. O., Yi, C., Alegre, A., Ni, J., et al. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15299-2 · Cited by 19
“Institutions Don’t Hug People:” A Roadmap for Building Trust, Connectedness, and Purpose Through Photovoice Collaboration
True, G., Davidson, L., Facundo, R., Meyer, D. V., Urbina, S., & Ono, S. S. (2019) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022167819853344 · Cited by 20
Stakeholder Engagement in Planning the Design of a National Needs Assessment for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management in Nepal
Archana, S., Karmacharya, B. M., Maharjan, R., Vaidya, A., Dhimal, M., Oli, N., Shrestha, R., Pyakurel, P., Annette, F., David, C., et al. (2019) · Global Heart · doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2019.05.002 · Cited by 18
Evolution of a research team: the patient partner perspective
Madison, S., Colon-Moya, A. D., Morales-Cosme, W., Lorenzi, M., Diaz, A., HICKSON, B., Monteiro, K., Ruiz, A. M., Perez, A., Redondo, R., et al. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00377-3 · Cited by 17
Measurable outcomes of consumer engagement in health research: A scoping review
DeBortoli, E., Soyer, H. P., Milne, D., Dissanayaka, N. N., GARTNER, C. E., Holt, J., Rae, K. M., Robison, L. E., Wallingford, C. K., & McInerney-Leo, A. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.994547 · Cited by 17
Advances in the clinical management of high‐risk Wilms tumors
Ortiz, M. V., Koenig, C., Armstrong, A. E., Brok, J. S., de Camargo, B., Mavinkurve‐Groothuis, A. M. C., Velásquez, T., Venkatramani, R., Woods, A. D., Dome, J. S., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.30342 · Cited by 17
What are the mechanisms that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research? A rapid realist review protocol
Shé, É. N., Davies, C., Blake, C. M., Crowley, R. K., McCann, A. H., Fullen, B. M., O’Donnell, D., O'Connor, J., Kelly, S., Darcy, M., et al. (2018) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.12790.1 · Cited by 15
Conducting research in psoriatic arthritis: the emerging role of patient research partners
Goel, N. (2019) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kez338 · Cited by 16
Engaging Community Stakeholders in Research on Best Practices for Clinical Genomic Sequencing
Griesemer, I., Staley, B. S., Lightfoot, A. F., Bain, L., Byrd, D., Conway, C., Grant, T. L., Leach, B., Milko, L. V., Mollison, L., et al. (2020) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme-2020-0074 · Cited by 17
Screening approaches for identifying fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: A systematic review
Grubb, M., Golden, A., Withers, A., Vellone, D. A., Young, A., & McLachlan, K. (2021) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14657 · Cited by 20
Evaluation of a project to engage patients in the development of a patient‐reported measure for HIV care (the I‐Score Study)
Lessard, D., Engler, K., Toupin, I., I‐Score Consulting Team, Routy, J., & Lebouché, B. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12845 · Cited by 16
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: An Overview of Key Concepts, Recommendations, Controversies, and Pitfalls
Kadom, N., Itri, J. N., Trofimova, A. V., Otero, H. J., & Horný, M. (2018) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.014 · Cited by 17
The Canadian retinoblastoma research advisory board: a framework for patient engagement
Gelkopf, M. J., Avramov, I., Baddeliyanage, R., Ristevski, I., Johnson, S. A., Flegg, K., & Dimaras, H. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-0177-8 · Cited by 17
Evaluation of patient involvement strategies in health technology assessment in Spain: the viewpoint of HTA researchers
Toledo‐Chávarri, A., Pego, Y. T., Reviriego, E., Ibargoyen-Roteta, N., Arribas, B. N., Edo, M. J. V., Benavent, P. G., Puigdomènech, E., & Linde, J. M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462320000586 · Cited by 16
Engaging with stakeholders for community-based health research in India: Lessons learnt, challenges and opportunities
Patil, R., Agarwal, D. M., Kaur, H., Gadgil, M., Jackson, T., Fernandes, G., & Juvekar, S. K. (2021) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.11.03072 · Cited by 16
Patient and public involvement in mobile health-based research for hay fever: a qualitative study of patient and public involvement implementation process
Fujio, K., Inomata, T., Fujisawa, K., Sung, J., Nakamura, M., Iwagami, M., Muto, K., Ebihara, N., Nakamura, M., Okano, M., et al. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00382-6 · Cited by 16
Advances in the clinical management of high‐risk Wilms tumors
Ortiz, M. V., Koenig, C., Armstrong, A. E., Brok, J. S., de Camargo, B., Mavinkurve‐Groothuis, A. M. C., Velásquez, T., Venkatramani, R., Woods, A. D., Dome, J. S., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.30153 · Cited by 16
Development of an international Core Outcome Set (COS) for best care for the dying person: study protocol
Zambrano, S. C., Haugen, D. F., van der Heide, A., Tripodoro, V., Ellershaw, J., Fürst, C. J., Voltz, R., Mason, S. R., Daud, M. L., Simone, G. G. D., et al. (2020) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00654-6 · Cited by 16
Engaging rural residents in patient-centered health care research
Levy, M. M., Holmes, C. L., Mendenhall, A. N., & Grube, W. A. (2017) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1164 · Cited by 17
Co-production of the quality of patient-centered outcomes research partnerships instrument for people with mental health conditions
Fortuna, K. L., Myers, A., Brooks, J., Collins-Pisano, C., Marceau, S., Pratt, S., Lyons, K., Walker, R., Thompson, S., Greene, K., et al. (2021) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1533 · Cited by 15
Perceived Significance of Engagement in Research Prioritization Among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals: A Qualitative Study
Elliott, M. J., Goodarzi, Z., Sale, J. E. M., Wilhelm, L., Laupacis, A., Hemmelgarn, B. R., & Straus, S. E. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1177/2054358118807480 · Cited by 15
Value and learning from carer involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation - Organising Support for Carers of Stroke Survivors (OSCARSS)
Mitchell, C., Burke, K., Halford, N., Rothwell, K., Darley, S., Woodward‐Nutt, K., Bowen, A., & Patchwood, E. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00193-7 · Cited by 15
Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challenges
Dreier, M., Baumgardt, J., Bock, T. A., Härter, M. C., The 8 Lives Team, & Liebherz, S. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00307-9 · Cited by 18
Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Lessons From Cochrane’s Public Health and Health Systems Network
Merner, B., Lowe, D. B., Walsh, L., Synnot, A., Stratil, J. M., Lewin, S. A., Glenton, C., von Philipsborn, P., Schonfeld, L., Ryan, R. E., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2021.306252 · Cited by 15
Children, young people and parent engagement in health intervention design and implementation: A scoping review
Crowther, D., McCulloch, H., Wong, H. W. L., Mackay, R., Johnson, C., Chorney, J. M. L., Ritchie, K., Lawrence, L. M., Bishop, A., Helwig, M., et al. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13572 · Cited by 15
A Study of Health and Social Care Professionals’ Family Focused Practice with Parents who have Mental Illness, their Children and Families in Northern Ireland
Davidson, G., Lagdon, S., Grant, A., Duffy, J., Devaney, J., Donaghy, M., Galway, K., Leavey, G., & Cartan, C. M. (2018) · Cited by 15
Patient and public involvement in a study of multimedia clinical trial information for children, young people and families
Sheridan, R., Preston, J., Stones, S. R., Ainsworth, S., Taylor, D. H., Challinor, R., Ainsworth, S., Martin‐Kerry, J., Brady, L., & Knapp, P. (2020) · Research for All · doi:10.18546/rfa.04.1.05 · Cited by 15
Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members
Rawl, S. M., Bailey, S., Cork, B., Fields, M. C., Griffin, T. W., Haunert, L., Kline, J., Krier, C., Lagunes, J., Lambert, R. L., et al. (2021) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945921993174 · Cited by 15
Subtle voices, distant futures: a critical look at conditions for patient involvement in Alzheimer’s biomarker research and beyond
Nielsen, K. D., & Boenink, M. (2019) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1676687 · Cited by 15
Move the north: evaluation of a regional stakeholder engagement initiative to support the development of a community-partnered physical activity research agenda
Pelletier, C., Pousette, A., Fox, G., Keahey, R., Ward, K., Faulkner, G., Rasali, D. P., & Allison, S. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0167-x · Cited by 14
How engagement of a diverse set of stakeholders shaped the design, implementation, and dissemination of a multicenter pragmatic trial of stroke transitional care: The COMPASS study
Gesell, S. B., Coleman, S. W., Mettam, L. H., Johnson, A. M., Sissine, M. E., & Duncan, P. W. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2020.552 · Cited by 16
Service user engagement in quality improvement: applying the national involvement standards
Green, S. A., Evans, L., Matthews, R., Jayacodi, S., Trite, J., Manickam, A., Evered, R., Green, J., Williams, J., Beveridge, E., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Mental Health Training Education and Practice · doi:10.1108/jmhtep-02-2016-0011 · Cited by 14
Risk Perceptions in Diabetic Patients Who Have Experienced Adverse Events: Implications for Patient Involvement in Regulatory Decisions
Sachs, M. L., Sporrong, S., Colding‐Jørgensen, M., Frokjaer, S., Helboe, P., Jelic, K., & Kaae, S. (2017) · Pharmaceutical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40290-017-0200-z · Cited by 14
Patient centered research to improve community involvement (PaRTICIpate) in diabetes self-management: a conference series for developing collaborations between researchers, stakeholders, and patients
Crumby, A. S., Holmes, E. R., & Rosenthal, M. (2018) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-018-0074-1 · Cited by 14
PaTH to partnership in stakeholder-engaged research: A framework for stakeholder engagement in the PaTH to Health Diabetes study
Poger, J. M., Yeh, H., Bryce, C. L., Carroll, J. K., Kong, L., Francis, E. B., & Kraschnewski, J. L. (2019) · Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.05.001 · Cited by 14
Improving Community Advisory Board Engagement in Precision Medicine Research to Reduce Health Disparities.
Connors, E. L., Selove, R., Canedo, J., Sanderson, M., Hull, P. C., Adams, M., McDermott, I., Barlow, C., Johns-Porter, D., McAfee, C. R., et al. (2019) · PubMed · Cited by 14
Engaging Stakeholders in the Design and Conduct of Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Alzheimer’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Disease–Related Dementias
Harrison, J., Maslow, K., Tambor, E. S., Phillips, L., Frank, L. B., Herndon, L., & Epstein-Lubow, G. P. (2020) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16630 · Cited by 14
A blended psychosocial support program for partners of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive muscular atrophy: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial
de Wit, J., Beelen, A., Drossaert, C. H. C., Kolijn, R., van den Berg, L. H., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., & Schröder, C. D. (2018) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-018-0232-5 · Cited by 12
Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement in Health Research: An Exploratory Study Using Multiple Survey Tools
Marshall, D. A., Suryaprakash, N., Bryan, S., Barker, K. L., MacKean, G., Zelinsky, S., McCarron, T. L., Santana, M., Moayyedi, P., & Lavallee, D. C. (2023) · Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad045 · Cited by 14
Patient informaticians: Turning patient voice into patient action
Petersen, C. C. (2018) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy014 · Cited by 13
So much more than a “pair of brown shoes”: Triumphs of patient and other stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research
Brodt, A., Norton, C. K., & Kratchman, A. L. (2015) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1057 · Cited by 13
Engaging Patient Advisory Boards of African American Community Members with Type 2 Diabetes in Implementing and Refining a Peer-Led Medication Adherence Intervention
Maurer, M. A., Shiyanbola, O. O., Mott, M., & Means, J. (2022) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy10020037 · Cited by 13
Stakeholder-Beteiligung in der klinischen Forschung: eine ethische Analyse
Hansen, S. L., Holetzek, T., Heyder, C., & Wiesemann, C. (2018) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-018-0487-7 · Cited by 13
The top research questions asked by people with lived depression experience in Alberta: a survey
Breault, L. J., Rittenbach, K., Hartle, K. D., Babins‐Wagner, R., de Beaudrap, C., Jasaui, Y., Ardell, E., Purdon, S. E., Michael, A., Sullivan, G., et al. (2018) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20180034 · Cited by 13
Patient and carer involvement in healthcare education, service delivery and research: avoiding tokenism
Smith, J., & Dransfield, A. (2019) · Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103105 · Cited by 13
Aktive Beteiligung von Patient*innen an klinischer Forschung – Eine Einführung
Schilling, I., Herbon, C., Jilani, H. S., Rathjen, K. I., & Gerhardus, A. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2020.06.007 · Cited by 12
Engaging Healthcare Staff and Stakeholders in Healthcare Simulation Modeling to Better Translate Research Into Health Impact: A Systematic Review
Zabell, T., Long, K. M., Scott, D. A., Hope, J., McLoughlin, I. P., & Enticott, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2021.644831 · Cited by 12
“This group… I felt like I was medicating myself from this cyberscam illness that was living with me.” A qualitative evaluation of co-designing cybersafety training resources with and for people with acquired brain injury
Carminati, J.-Y. J., Ponsford, J. L., & Gould, K. R. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2139418 · Cited by 12
Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Stakeholder-engaged Research (SER)
Mackie, T. I., Sheldrick, R. C., de Ferranti, S. D., Saunders, T. S., Rojas, E. G., & Leslie, L. K. (2016) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000593 · Cited by 12
Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices
Nsangi, A., Oxman, A. D., Oxman, M., Rosenbaum, S., Semakula, D., Ssenyonga, R., Mugisha, M., Chelagat, F., Kaseje, M., Nyirazinyoye, L., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239985 · Cited by 10
Patient-Oriented Research to Improve Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for People of Diverse Ethnocultural Groups in Routine Practice
Sapkota, R. P., Valli, E., Wilhelms, A., Adlam, K., Bourgeault, L., Heron, V., Dickerson, K. C., Nugent, M., & Hadjistavropoulos, H. D. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11152135 · Cited by 11
Engaging patients as partners in health research: Lessons from BC, Canada
Holmes, B. J., Bryan, S., Ho, K., & McGavin, C. (2018) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470417741712 · Cited by 13
Engagement design in studies on pregnancy and infant health using social media: Systematic review
Shieh, C., Khan, I., & Umoren, R. A. (2020) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101113 · Cited by 12
Evaluation of the impact of patient involvement in health technology assessments: A scoping review
Mason, R. J., Searle, K., Bombard, Y., Rahmadian, A. P., Chambers, A., Mai, H., Morrison, M., Chan, K., & Jerzak, K. J. (2020) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462320000239 · Cited by 12
Engaging patients as partners in a multicentre trial of spinal versus general anaesthesia for older adults
Hruslinski, J., Menio, D. A., Hymes, R. A., Jaffe, J. D., Langlois, C., Ramsey, L., Gaskins, L. J., Neuman, M. D., Looke, T., Bent, S., et al. (2020) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.052 · Cited by 11
Implementing Positive Behavior Support Within Preschool Settings: Group Functional Assessment and CW-FIT
Mahon, D., Gunning, C., Holloway, J., & Lydon, H. (2020) · Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions · doi:10.1177/1098300719890065 · Cited by 11

Authors: Esmail, L., Moore, E., & Rein, A.
Affiliations: AcademyHealth (US)
ORCID: Esmail, Laura
Moore, Emily
Venue: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Publisher: Becaris Publishing Limited
Published: 2015-03
Volume: 4
Issue: 2
Pages: 133-145
ISSN: 2042-6305 (ISSN-L)
2042-6313
DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.79
OpenAlex: W2096611776
Cited by: 502
References: 68
Citations by year: 2026: 32 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
FWCI: 5.62
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-nc-nd
Locations: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords: patient engagement, stakeholder engagement, engagement outcomes, return on investment
MeSH terms: Humans, Patient Participation, Professional-Patient Relations, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks