Cited by 502Mental Health and Patient InvolvementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice

Open access

Esmail, Laura, Moore, Emily, Rein, Alison·2015·Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite the growing demand for research that engages stakeholders, there is limited evidence in the literature to demonstrate its value – or return on investment. This gap indicates a general lack of evaluation of engagement activities. To adequately inform engagement activities, we need to further investigate the dividends of engaged research, and how to evaluate these effects. This paper synthesizes the literature on hypothesized impacts of engagement, shares what has been evaluated and identifies steps needed to reduce the gap between engagement's promises and the underlying evidence supporting its practice. This assessment provides explicit guidance for better alignment of engagement's promised benefits with evaluation efforts and identifies specific areas for development of evaluative measures and better reporting processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/cer.14.79

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243904271724 · Cited by 1,860
Patient And Family Engagement: A Framework For Understanding The Elements And Developing Interventions And Policies
Carman, K. L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M. E., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133 · Cited by 1,770
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x · Cited by 1,598
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409
Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment
Charlton, J. I. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0640 · Cited by 1,124
Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility
Greenwood, M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y · Cited by 1,061
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes
Abelson, J., Forest, P., Eyles, J. D., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00343-x · Cited by 983
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E. M., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D. M., Rhodes, S. D., Samuel‐Hodge, C. D., Maty, S. C., Lux, L. J., et al. (2004) · PubMed Central · Cited by 959
Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2004) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243903259197 · Cited by 882
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework
Shippee, N. D., Garces, J. P. D., López, G., Wang, Z., Elraiyah, T. A., Nabhan, M., Brito, J. P., Boehmer, K. B., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., et al. (2013) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12090 · Cited by 630

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Krumholz H . National priorities and research agenda . In : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute National Patient and Stakeholder Dialogue . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute , Washington, DC, USA ( 2012 ).
Garces JPD , Lopez GJP , Wang Z Eliciting Patient Perspective in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: a Meta Narrative Systematic Review . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) , Washington, DC, USA , 1 – 163 ( 2012 ).
Mullins CD . Integrating Patients’ Voices in Study Design Elements with a Focus on Hard-to-reach Populations . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) , Washington, DC, USA ( 2012 ).
Nass PL , Levine S , Yancy C . Methods for Involving Patients in Topic Generation for Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research – an International Perspective . Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) , Washington, DC, USA ( 2012 ).

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 502

If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
Combs, T., Carothers, B. J., Liu, Y., Evanoff, B., & Luke, D. A. (2021) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2021.17 · Cited by 4
User experiences of structured stakeholder engagement to consider transferability: The TRANSFER approach
Munthe‐Kaas, H. M., Nøkleby, H., & Rosenbaum, S. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1284 · Cited by 3
Combining Stakeholder-Engaged Research and the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia
Szabo, G., Obermeyer, J., Cauthorn, A., Hornbostel, M., & Flacco, J. (2023) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0000000000000305 · Cited by 4
Stakeholder engagement in European brain research: Experiences of the Lifebrain consortium
Budin‐Ljøsne, I., Friedman, B. B., Baaré, W. F. C., David Bartrés-faz, A., Carver, R. B., Drevon, C. A., Ebmeier, K. P., Fjell, A. M., Ghisletta, P., Henson, R. N., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13747 · Cited by 4
Examining how study teams manage different viewpoints and priorities in patient‐centered outcomes research: Results of an embedded multiple case study
Maurer, M. E., Hilliard, T. S., Frazier, K., Forsythe, L. P., Mosbacher, R., & Carman, K. L. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13765 · Cited by 4
Pragmatic design and inclusion of patient–partner representatives improves participant experience in clinical research
Pogorzelski, D., Wells, J. L., Marvel, D. M., Palmer, J. E., Mullins, C. D., Medeiros, M., Gallant, J. L., Spicer, E., Bergin, P. F., Gitajn, I. L., et al. (2023) · OTA International The Open Access Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/oi9.0000000000000287 · Cited by 4
Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey
Nohová, I., Andrews, J., Votan, B., Miller, A., Sehouli, J., & Berger, R. (2023) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.1735 · Cited by 4
Engagement in evaluation
Nolton, E. C., & Forsythe, L. P. (2024) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781803928289.00021 · Cited by 4
People, Practices, and Places: Realities That Influence Evidence‐Based Practice Uptake
Tucker, S. (2017) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12216 · Cited by 4
Exploring the potential role of community engagement in evaluating clinical and translational science grant proposals
Treem, J. W., Schneider, M. L., Zender, R., & Sorkin, D. H. (2018) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2018.311 · Cited by 4
Patient engagement in research; benefits, challenges, importance, and implicationsPreprint
Ivany, C., Hudson, T., Schneider, P., Farrukh, H., Swinton, M., & Ghert, M. A. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.03.28.23287870 · Cited by 4
Community and Academic Synergy for Cancer Survivorship Care Delivery Enhancement (Project CASCADE): a study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in Texas primary care community health centers
Millett, M.-L. E., Malthaner, L., McCallister, K., Craig, D. W., Eary, R. L., Valerio-Shewmaker, M. A., Shay, L. A., Rajan, S. S., Ma, H. Y., Ghosh, S., et al. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-03108-1 · Cited by 3
Patient engagement in pharmaceutical development: Where are we? – Report from a symposium
Stegemann, S., Almarsdóttir, A. B., & Vermehren, C. (2023) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.02.005 · Cited by 3
Risk Governance Dilemmas and Democratization: Public Trust, Risk Perception and Public Participation in Risk Decision-Making
Gattinger, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24271-7_1 · Cited by 3
Current and Future Implementation of Digitally Delivered Psychotherapies: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Investigation of Client, Clinician, and Community Partner Perspectives
Yap, S., Allen, R. R., Aquin, C., Bright, K. S., Brown, M. R. G., Burback, L., Winkler, O., Jones, C., Hayward, J., Wells, K., et al. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12191971 · Cited by 3
Application of the Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions in the development of VIeSA, an intervention to support healthy ageing among community-dwelling older adults
Ashikali, E., Ludwig, C., Graf, C. E., Ionita, I., & Busnel, C. (2024) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-024-05399-y · Cited by 3
DNVF Memorandum Partizipative Versorgungsforschung (Teil 1)
Brütt, A. L., Borgmann, S. O., Buchholz, E., Burggraf, L., Engler, J., Fischer, F., Holetzek, T., Houwaart, S., Icks, A., Jagoda, F. A., et al. (2025) · Das Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1055/a-2665-0028 · Cited by 3
Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians
Kohn, J. E., Unger, Z., Dolatshahi, J., Simons, H. R., & Rein, A. L. (2017) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0068 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
The involvement of people living with HIV in the development of HIV-specific or inclusive health instruments: a mixed methods review
Lènàrt, A., Engler, K., Lessard, D., Toupin, I., Rodríguez, C., & Lebouché, B. (2019) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2019.1653435 · Cited by 3
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
Manhas, K. P., Olson, K. L., Churchill, K., Vohra, S., & Wasylak, T. (2021) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001261 · Cited by 3
A Patient and Public Involvement Study to Explore the Need for Further Research into the Experience of Younger Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty
Mew, L. E., Heaslip, V., Immins, T., & Wainwright, T. W. (2022) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/23743735221083166 · Cited by 3
An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD
Bell‐Brown, A., Watabayashi, K., Kreizenbeck, K. L., Ramsey, S. D., Bansal, A., Barlow, W. E., Lyman, G. H., Hershman, D. L., Mercurio, A. M., Segarra-Vázquez, B., et al. (2022) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2022-0158 · Cited by 3
Joining Forces with Veterans: Veterans’ and Researchers’ Perspectives on Veteran-Centered Engagement Practices
Hibler, D., Krause‐Parello, C. A., Gliba, B., Morris, J., & Mullins, C. D. (2023) · Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship · doi:10.54656/jces.v15i2.463 · Cited by 3
Co-Developing Patient-Centered Information: A Focus Group Study of Asthma Patients’ Preferences and Attitudes towards New Medical Treatment Guidelines
Holst, S. S., & Vermehren, C. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16030456 · Cited by 3
A Scoping Review on Resources, Tools, and Programs to Support Women’s Leadership in Global Health: What Is Available, What Works, and How Do We Know?
Chung, E., El‐Harakeh, A., Weinberg, J. L., Azeez, O., Ortigoza, A. F., Johnson, A. C., Harrison, M., & Kalbarczyk, A. (2023) · Annals of Global Health · doi:10.5334/aogh.3921 · Cited by 3
“Collapsing into Darkness”: An Exploratory Qualitative Thematic Analysis of the Experience of Workplace Reintegration among Nurses with Operational Stress Injuries
Jones, C., Juby, B., Spencer, S., Smith‐MacDonald, L., O’Greysik, E., Vincent, M., Mooney, C., Bright, K. S., Sevigny, P. R., Burback, L., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20176664 · Cited by 3
Co-design knowledge mobilization tools for universal accessibility in municipalities
Corcuff, M., Lamontagne, M., Routhier, F., & Morales, E. (2024) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1331728 · Cited by 3
The ELECTRA Trial: Approach to Contemporary Challenges in the Development and Implementation of Double-Blinded, Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trials in Low-Volume High-Complexity Surgical Oncology
Ewings, S. M., Peppa, N., Griffiths, D., Hawkins, M., Birch, C., Naga, A. F., Parsons, G., Al‐Shamkhani, A., Lord, J. L., Bateman, A. C., et al. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17030341 · Cited by 3
Aktive Beteiligung von Medizinischen Fachangestellten in der allgemeinmedizinischen Forschung in Deutschland
Kersten, S., Kuschick, D., Braesigk, A., Polanc, A., & Salm, S. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.012 · Cited by 3
A protocol for stakeholder engagement in deliver-EE: A pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community
Harrison, J., Balkan, E., Bernard, K. P., Gadbois, E. A., & Thomas, K. S. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107535 · Cited by 3
Adding exercise to a care pathway for patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancerPreprint
Daun, J. T., Twomey, R., Dort, J. C., Capozzi, L., Crump, T., Francis, G., Matthews, T. W., Chandarana, S. P., Hart, R. D., Schrag, C. H., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31236/osf.io/dpmjq · Cited by 3
Supporting families and caregivers of children with disabilities through a parent peer mentor (PPM): experiences from a patient-oriented research network
Yamaguchi, S., Costello, C., Lalonde, C., McCarry, S., Majnemer, A., & Shikako, K. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00481-y · Cited by 2
“Patient engagement also responds to the moral obligation under the premise “nothing about us, without us” to facilitate the right of involvement of patients and other interested parties [15, 16, 29].”
Background
Challenges to Engaging Women Veterans in Quality Improvement From Patient Care to Policy: Women's Health Managers' Perspectives
Olmos‐Ochoa, T. T., Luger, T. M., Oishi, A., Dyer, K. E., Sumberg, A., Canelo, I. A., Gideonse, T. K., Cheney, A. M., Yano, E. M., & Hamilton, A. B. (2022) · Women s Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2022.08.004 · Cited by 2
Pilot Study Exploring the Perspectives of Canadian Clients Who Received Digitally Delivered Psychotherapies Utilized for Trauma-Affected Populations
Yap, S., Allen, R. R., Bright, K. S., Brown, M. R. G., Burback, L., Hayward, J., Winkler, O., Wells, K., Jones, C., Sevigny, P. R., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22020220 · Cited by 2
Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature
West, A. L., Eldreth, D. L., DANIELS, J. P., & Bower, K. M. (2025) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z · Cited by 2
Active involvement of children aged 11–12 years in the development of a healthy nutrition intervention – a qualitative evaluation from researchers’ and children’s perspectives
Jilani, H. S., Schilling, I., Gerhardus, A., & Klink, U. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24019-x · Cited by 2
Advance Care Planning in German General Practice: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study on Patients' Expectations and Experiences
Schmidt, A., Weckbecker, K., der Schmitten, J. I., Götze, K., & Mortsiefer, A. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70392 · Cited by 2
A Communication Perspective on What Patient Advisory Boards Do: Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis and Negotiating Advice
Ho, E. Y., Agne, R. R., Santana, T., Thompson, N., McClendon, G., Ng, E., Merrick, S., Gonzalez, F., Smith, T., Drewke, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07062-3 · Cited by 2
Effective engagement of a stakeholder advisory board in severe mental illness (SMI) research: A case study of a clinical trial to improve adherence among people with SMI and hypertension
Paltin, D., Montoya, J. L., Weise, C., Conroy, C. M., Radatz, E. E., Stange, K. C., Moore, D. J., Sajatovic, M., & Levin, J. B. (2022) · International Journal of Healthcare · doi:10.5430/ijh.v8n2p9 · Cited by 2
Team-focused implementation strategies to improve implementation of mental health screening and referral in rural Children’s Advocacy Centers: study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized hybrid type 2 trial
McGuier, E. A., Aarons, G. A., Wright, J. D., Fortney, J. C., Powell, B. J., Rothenberger, S. D., Weingart, L. R., Miller, E. A., & Kolko, D. J. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00437-z · Cited by 2
Four year evaluation of a parent advisory group to support a research program for knowledge translation in child health
Hartling, L., Elliott, S. A., Mabbott, A. P., Leung, J., Shearer, K., Smith, C., & Scott, S. D. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00547-5 · Cited by 2
Mapping stakeholders to maximise the impact of research on health inequalities for people with learning disabilities: The development of a framework for the Making Positive Moves study
Beeken, F., Katsampa, D., Duxbury, M., Ellis‐Caird, H., Head, A., Prowse, S., Wellsted, D. M., Zormati, P., Mengoni, S. E., & Rhodes, L. (2024) · British Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1111/bld.12591 · Cited by 2
Using science communication research to practice iterative engagement in collaborative nutrient management
Canfield, K. N., & Chatelain, C. D. (2024) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.23030801 · Cited by 2
Does engagement matter? The impact of patient and community engagement on implementation of cardiovascular health materials in primary care settings
ZITTLEMAN, L. K., Westfall, J. M., Callen, D., Herrick, A. M., Nkouaga, C., Simpson, M., Dickinson, L. M., Fernald, D. H., Kaufman, A., English, A. F., et al. (2024) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-024-02365-w · Cited by 2
What Lies Beneath? The Role of Community Engagement in Translating COVID-19 Research Findings to Policy-Makers
Merner, B., Hill, S., Saich, F., Virgona, A., Jin, D., Pedrana, A. E., Keren, C., Chung, R. K. Y., Osborne, D., Wilkinson, A. L., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8249 · Cited by 2
Researcher and partner perspectives on the relationship between engagement in research and three uses of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research study findings
Maurer, M. E., Lavelle, M. E., Hilliard, T. S., Frazier, K., Agraviador, D., Mosbacher, R., Forsythe, L. P., & Carman, K. L. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00632-9 · Cited by 2
Stakeholder Engagement Through the Lens of Indian Ethos: A Study of Indian Banking
Rajawat, S., & Mahajan, R. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83549-254-320251005 · Cited by 3
Systematic review of provider involvement in heart failure self‐care interventions
Bryant, R., Alonzo, A., & Schmillen, H. (2017) · Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12501 · Cited by 4
Developing a Model of a Patient-Group Pathway to Accessing Cancer Clinical Trials in Canada
Batist, G., Michaud, S., Richards, D. P., Servidio-Italiano, F., & Stein, B. D. (2018) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3747/co.25.4213 · Cited by 2
Engaging Citizens and Patients in Health Research: Learning from Experience
Zelmer, J. (2016) · Healthcare policy · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2016.24781 · Cited by 2
Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research
Hong, Y. D., Goto, D., & Mullins, C. D. (2017) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0082 · Cited by 2
Die klinische Anwendung von hiPS-Zellen: ein Überblick
Gerke, S., & Hansen, S. L. (2019) · Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-59052-2_1 · Cited by 2
Stakeholder engagement in the design and conduct of pragmatic randomized trials
Concannon, T. W., Stem, K., Chaplin, J. E., & Girman, C. J. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817663-4.00014-3 · Cited by 2
Protocol for Establishing a Stakeholder Group for Primary Care Research into Cancer Using a Modified 7P Framework and an e-Delphi Process
Jacob, B. M., Burns, H. E., Chong, M. C., Clyne, B., O’Connor, L. L., Bennett, K., & Redmond, P. (2023) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13750.2 · Cited by 2
Building infrastructures for university-community knowledge exchange: The Role of Information Professionals and Literacy Educators
Forest, H. D., Freund, L., McCauley, A., O'Brien, H. L., & Smythe, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · doi:10.29173/cais1073 · Cited by 2
Welcome to Volume 5 of the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Dormer, L. (2015) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer.15.55 · Cited by 2
PROLIFERATE: An Adaptable Framework to Evaluate Participatory Research ProductsPreprint
de Plaza, M. A. P., Archibald, M. M., Lawless, M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Mudd, A., McMillan, P., & Kitson, A. A. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-146129/v1 · Cited by 2
Standardised Data on Initiatives – STARDIT: Beta VersionPreprint
Nunn, J., & Shafee, T. M. A. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/w5xj6 · Cited by 2
Exploring the Perspectives of Clients and Clinicians Regarding Digitally Delivered Psychotherapies Utilized for Trauma-Affected PopulationsPreprint
Yap, S., Wozniak, R., Bright, K. S., Brown, M. R., Burback, L., Hayward, J., Winkler, O., Wells, K., Jones, C., Sevigny, P. R., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.09.24305560 · Cited by 2
Examining the benefits of paramedic engagement for the novice researcher
Coppola, A. (2018) · Journal of Paramedic Practice · doi:10.12968/jpar.2018.10.12.524 · Cited by 1
Public Engagement on Childhood Vaccination: Democratizing Policy Decision-Making Through Public Deliberation
Chuong, K. H., Rotella, A., Cooper, E. J., & O’Doherty, K. C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24271-7_11 · Cited by 1
Stakeholder Engagement in Type 1 Diabetes Research, Quality Improvement, and Clinical Care
Rioles, N. A., March, C. A., Muñoz, C. E., Ilkowitz, J. T., OHMER, A. L., & Wolf, R. M. (2023) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2023.09.007 · Cited by 1
Evaluation Approaches for Dissemination and Implementation Research
Gaglio, B., & Glasgow, R. E. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197660690.003.0017 · Cited by 1
Review article: A primer for clinical researchers in the emergency department: Part XIII . Strategies to engage staff and enhance participant recruitment in emergency department research
O’Brien, S., Wilson, C. L., Duck, M., Nieva, G., Rao, M. P., & Haskell, L. (2024) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/1742-6723.14505 · Cited by 2
Developing a framework for understanding diagnostic reconciliation based on evidence review, stakeholder engagement, and practice evaluation
Perneth, S. A., Garcia, G. P. R., Brito, J. P., Gandhi, T. K., Bylund, C. L., Hargraves, I. G., & Ospina, N. S. (2024) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2024-0132 · Cited by 2
Engaging Red River Métis families in Manitoba in the development of child health resources – findings from a qualitative study
Knisley, L., Driedger, S. M., Hartling, L., Chartrand, F., Sanguins, J., & Scott, S. D. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00659-y · Cited by 1
Exploring the Perspectives of Canadian Clinicians Regarding Digitally Delivered Psychotherapies Utilized for Trauma-Affected Populations
Yap, S., Allen, R. R., Bright, K. S., Brown, M., Burback, L., Hayward, J., Winkler, O., Wells, K., Jones, C., Sevigny, P. R., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22010081 · Cited by 1
Level of maturity of ESG governance practices: implications on organizational performance
Trentin, L., & MARQUES, M. (2025) · Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia · doi:10.5585/2025.27483 · Cited by 1
Partnering With Youth to Enhance Healthcare Access and Experience: Lessons Learned From a Teen Advisory Group
Esquivel, C. H., Flores, S. A., Garcia, K., Garney, W. R., & Wilson, K. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70220 · Cited by 1
Beyond Transactional Relationships in Community-Based Participatory Healthcare Research
Burrell, D. N., Mullins, C. D., & Enobun, B. (2025) · Health Economics and Management Review · doi:10.61093/hem.2025.2-02 · Cited by 1
Research in Partnership With Older People—Involvement in Conducting and Analysing Focus Groups
Reeck, N., Völkel, A., Mammes, M., Urbahn‐Schiefer, D., Reineking, B., Stuckenschneider, T., & Brütt, A. L. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70354 · Cited by 1
Engagement Methods in Brain Tumor Genomic Research: Multimethod Comparative Study
DeCamp, M. W., Barnard, J. G., Ritger, C., Helmkamp, L. J., Begum, A., Garcia-Hernandez, S., Fischmann, R., Gay, N., Gonzalez-Fisher, R. F., Johnson, K. C., et al. (2025) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/68852 · Cited by 1
Training Adolescents and Young Adults to be Partners in Research: Co‐Creating the Young Patients' Autoimmune Research and Empowerment Alliance
Khurana, A., Anderson, K., Carandang, K. M., Chintagunta, E., Ziegler, J., & Wells, C. K. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70642 · Cited by 1
Paediatric patient experience during hospitalisation stays: Developing paediatric PREMS questionnaires through a collaborative Delphi study
Rosis, S. D., Spataro, V., Hazelzet, J. A., Peruzzo, E., & Bonciani, M. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106821 · Cited by 1
Embedding Patient and Public Engagement in a Cancer Project: Protocol for a Qualitative Study
Teodorowski, P., Arana, M., Garza, D. G., Green, J. B., Miner, J., Duncan, E., Figueroa, J. D., Forbat, L., & Jackson, S. S. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/87330 · Cited by 1
What Matters Most: The Top 10 Child and Adolescent Cancer Research Priorities in Australia
Silva, G. D., Robertson, E. G., Bowers, A. P., Schilstra, C. E., Patel, S. K., McCarthy, M. C., McLoone, J. K., Pole, J. D., Sansom‐Daly, U. M., Oppelaar, S., et al. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70689 · Cited by 1
Ethische Analyse der klinischen Forschung mit humanen induzierten pluripotenten Stammzellen
Hansen, S. L., Heyder, C., & Wiesemann, C. (2020) · Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-59052-2_7 · Cited by 1
From research to daily clinical practice: implementation of orthogeriatric co-management in the trauma ward
Janssens, S., Deschodt, M., Dejaeger, M., Fagard, K., Cerulus, M., Cosyns, H., Flamaing, J., Herteleer, M., & Sermon, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2023.1249832 · Cited by 2
Gaps between needs of patient and public involvement and interests of researchers on pancreatic cancer
Resell, M., Stranden, M., Qvigstad, G., Chen, D., & Zhao, C. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.108125 · Cited by 1
How the expert nursing role was used to facilitate the co-design of a patient interview study
Kittscha, J., Wilson, V., Fairbrother, G., & Bliokas, V. V. (2024) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.2024.e1918 · Cited by 1
Stakeholder engagement to develop a directory of COVID-19 related mental health services in Vietnam: reflections on a participatory approach
Thai, J. N., Craig, W. L., Fisher, J., & Chambers, M. (2024) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20491.1 · Cited by 1
Bringing experiences of healthcare in custody into quality improvement
Murphy, Y., Winzer, A., Ogilvie, L. D., Mayoh, M., & McLeod, K. (2024) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/08404704241235891 · Cited by 1
Quality of ESG Reporting and Disclosure Practices of Indian Companies
Abhishek, N., Suraj, N., & Divyashree, M. S. (2024) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3771-4.ch008 · Cited by 1
Engaging survivor and oncologist stakeholders to develop a patient-reported outcome assessment to use as a component of survivorship care
Neuman, H. B., Kwekkeboom, K. L., Tevaarwerk, A. J., Phelps, K., Tucholka, J. L., Maxcy, C., Breuer, C. R., & Schumacher, J. R. (2024) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-024-09022-z · Cited by 1
Menggerakan Wakaf Kompos; Aksi Lokal Penguatan Peran Ekologis Masjid untuk Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim
Suhendi, S., Umar, U., Aryanti, Z., Annisah, S., & Syaferi, A. (2024) · Bulletin of Community Engagement · doi:10.51278/bce.v4i2.1697 · Cited by 1
Experience-based co-design of a smartphone app for post-stroke aphasia self-management: a process evaluation
Hudson, K., Burton, B., Worthy, P., Isaacs, M. L., Shrubsole, K., Palmer, V. J., Ng, Z. Y., Copland, D. A., Angwin, A. J., Wiles, J., et al. (2025) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1071/ib24127 · Cited by 1
Current practice of stakeholder engagement: researchers’ experiences in North America, DACH countries and China
Heiß, A., Wang, J., Fei, Y., Xia, R., Icke, K., Pach, D., & Witt, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0279 · Cited by 1
Celebrating 10 years of the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Dormer, L. (2021) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2021-0249 · Cited by 1
Monitoring and Evaluation of Stakeholder Engagement in Health Care Research
Concannon, T. W., & Palm, M. E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83028-1_13 · Cited by 1
Science to support toxics governance : tracking mercury and other pollutants from policy to impacts
Giang, A. (2017) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Factors Affecting Clinical Research Enrollment Among Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
Bouranis, N. (2020) · doi:10.15760/etd.7337 · Cited by 1
Understanding Parents’ Experiences and Information Needs to Inform a Digital Knowledge Translation Tool about Pediatric Functional Constipation
Thompson, A. P. (2021) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3-3gqn-tf74 · Cited by 1
The Use of Co-Design in Developing Physical Activity Interventions for Older Adults: A Scoping ReviewPreprint
Constantin, N., Edward, H., Ng, H., Radisic, A., Yule, A., D’Asti, A., D’Amore, C., Reid, J. C., & Beauchamp, M. K. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1243879/v1 · Cited by 1
The Impact of Patient Engagement on Trials and Trialists in Ontario, Canada: an Interview Study With IMPACT AwardeesPreprint
Nicholls, S. G., Fox, G., Monfaredi, Z., Poole, E., Garritty, C., Maybee, A., Presseau, J., Shea, B., & Fergusson, D. A. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1386139/v1 · Cited by 1
Community Engagement in Kidney Research: Guatemalan ExperiencePreprint
Aguilar‐González, A., Lou‐Meda, R., Chocó, A., & MOIST, L. M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1379161/v1 · Cited by 1
Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challengesPreprint
Dreier, M., Baumgardt, J., Bock, T. A., Härter, M. C., & Liebherz, S. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-499926/v1 · Cited by 2
Using Ethnographic Approaches to Document, Evaluate, and Facilitate Virtual Community-Engaged Implementation ResearchPreprint
Rabin, B. A., Cain, K. L., Salgin, L., Watson, P., Oswald, W., Kaiser, B. N., Ayers, L. O., Yi, C., Alegre, A., Ni, J., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2002118/v1 · Cited by 1
How Can Researchers and Research Users Initiate Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) Partnerships
Zych, M. M. (2019) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Developing Ethical Web- and Mobile-Based Technologies for Dementia
Robillard, J. M., & Feng, T. L. (2019) · doi:10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0014
Comparing Patient Engagement and Patient Advocacy Activities and Measuring Preferred Roles in Medical Decision Making among Cystic Fibrosis Patients, Caregivers, Family Members and Patient Advocates
Saliba, D. (2019) · TSpace (University of Toronto)

Authors: Esmail, L., Moore, E., & Rein, A.
Affiliations: AcademyHealth (US)
ORCID: Esmail, Laura
Moore, Emily
Venue: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Publisher: Becaris Publishing Limited
Published: 2015-03
Volume: 4
Issue: 2
Pages: 133-145
ISSN: 2042-6305 (ISSN-L)
2042-6313
DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.79
OpenAlex: W2096611776
Cited by: 502
References: 68
Citations by year: 2026: 32 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
FWCI: 5.62
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-nc-nd
Locations: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords: patient engagement, stakeholder engagement, engagement outcomes, return on investment
MeSH terms: Humans, Patient Participation, Professional-Patient Relations, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks