Cited by 35Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationSinusitis and nasal conditions

Objective and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis

Open access
Mendes, Aline I. S., Wandalsen, Gustavo F., Solé, Dirceu·2012·Jornal de Pediatria

Abstract

Objective To correlate objective assessment of nasal obstruction, as measured by acoustic rhinometry (volume of the first 5 cm of the nasal cavity) and active anterior rhinomanometry (total nasal airway resistance), with its subjective evaluation (obstruction scores). Method Thirty patients, aged 7 to 18 years, with persistent allergic rhinitis and thirty controls were enrolled. The obstruction score was reported for the whole nasal cavity and for each nostril separately. The three variables were measured at baseline and after induction of nasal obstruction. Results There were significant and negative correlations between resistance and nasal volume in all groups and scenarios, except for the most obstructed nostril, in the control group, post-obstruction. For the whole nasal cavity, there was no significant correlation between objective and subjective variables except between score and total nasal cavity volume in the control group, post-obstruction. Regarding the most obstructed nostril, we found a significant negative correlation between score and resistance and a significant positive correlation between score and volume for the total group at baseline. There were no clear differences in the correlation coefficients found in patients and controls. The correlation coefficients did not change after induction of nasal obstruction. Conclusions Objective assessment of nasal obstruction did not correlate significantly with subjective evaluation for the nasal cavity as a whole, b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2223/jped.2213

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mendes et al found no significant correlation between the objective and subjective methods used in children with allergic rhinitis and healthy controls.

    “No significant correlation was detected between the objective and subjective methods used.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendes, A. I. S., Wandalsen, G. F., & Solé, D.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Jornal de Pediatria
Published
2012-09-22
Volume
88
Issue
5
Pages
389-95
ISSN
0021-7557 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1591385081
Cited by
35
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Jornal de Pediatria (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
nasal obstruction, allergic rhinitis, children, adolescents, acoustic rhinometry, active anterior rhinomanometry, nasal resistance, nasal cavity volume, subjective and objective assessment, unilateral nasal obstruction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Airway Resistance, Child, Female, Histamine, Humans, Male, Nasal Cavity, Nasal Provocation Tests, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Nasal Obstruction, Case-Control Studies, Rhinometry, Acoustic, Rhinomanometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review