Cited by 22Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Handling missing data in single-case studies

Open access
Peng, Chao-Ying Joanne, Chen, Li-Ting·2018·Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Abstract

Multiple imputation is illustrated for dealing with missing data in a published SCED study. Results were compared to those obtained from available data. Merits and issues of implementation are discussed. Recommendations are offered on primal/advanced readings, statistical software, and future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22237/jmasm/1525133280

Cites

16 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ake, C. F. (2005). Rounding after multiple imputation with non-binary categorical covariates. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual SAS® Users Group International conference (paper 112-30). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Retrieved from http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/112-30.pdf
  2. Allison, P. D. (2005). Imputation of categorical variables with PROC MI. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual SAS® Users Group International conference (paper 113-30). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Retrieved from http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/113-30.pdf
  3. Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1992). Statistical analysis in single-case research: Issues, procedures, and recommendations, with applications to multiple behaviors. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 159-186).
  4. Carpenter, J., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Multiple imputation using MLwiN. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 16(2), 9-18. Retrieved from http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmm/migrated/documents/new16- 2.pdf
  5. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1995). Analysis of longitudinal data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  7. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  8. Graham, J. W., & Schafer, J. L. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
  10. Marascuilo, L. A., & Busk, P. L. (1988). Combining statistics for multiple- baseline AB and replicated ABAB designs across subjects. Behavioral Assessment, 10(1), 1-28.
  11. Peng, C.-Y. J., Harwell, M., Liou, S.-M., Ehman, L. H. (2006). Advances in missing data methods and implications for educational research. In S. Sawilowsky (Ed.), Real data analysis (pp. 31-78).
  12. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, C.-Y. J., & Chen, L.-T.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
Published
2018-06-07
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
1538-9472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805387321
Cited by
22
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Human Biology (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
missing data, single-case experimental design, multiple imputation, missing data imputation, statistical software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review