Cited by 23Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

A randomization test wrapper for synthesizing single-case experiments using multilevel models: a Monte Carlo simulation study

Open access
Michiels, Bart, Tanious, René, De, Tamal Kumar, Onghena, Patrick·2020·Behavior Research Methods

Abstract

Multilevel models (MLMs) have been proposed in single-case research, to synthesize data from a group of cases in a multiple-baseline design (MBD). A limitation of this approach is that MLMs require several statistical assumptions that are often violated in single-case research. In this article we propose a solution to this limitation by presenting a randomization test (RT) wrapper for MLMs that offers a nonparametric way to evaluate treatment effects, without making distributional assumptions or an assumption of random sampling. We present the rationale underlying the proposed technique and validate its performance (with respect to Type I error rate and power) as compared to parametric statistical inference in MLMs, in the context of evaluating the average treatment effect across cases in an MBD. We performed a simulation study that manipulated the numbers of cases and of observations per case in a dataset, the data variability between cases, the distributional characteristics of the data, the level of autocorrelation, and the size of the treatment effect in the data. The results showed that the power of the RT wrapper is superior to the power of parametric tests based on F distributions for MBDs with fewer than five cases, and that the Type I error rate of the RT wrapper is controlled for bimodal data, whereas this is not the case for traditional MLMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13428-019-01266-6

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cassell, D. L. (2002). A randomization-test wrapper for SAS® PROCs. SAS User's Group International Proceedings, 27, 251. Retrieved from http://www.lexjansen.com/wuss/2002/WUSS02023.pdf
  2. Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univar- iate distributions, Vol. 2 (2nd). New York: Wiley.
  3. Onghena, P. (2005). Single-case designs. In B. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, vol. 4 (pp. 1850-1854). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  4. a000034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michiels, B., Tanious, R., De, T. K., & Onghena, P.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Onghena, Patrick
Venue
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2019-07-03
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
654-666
ISSN
  • 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-3528
OpenAlex
W2953414565
Cited by
23
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Research Foundation – Flanders (G.0593.14)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
permutation tests, multilevel models, single subject research, multiple baseline design, nonparametric inference, treatment effect estimation, type I error rate, statistical power, bimodal data, autocorrelation, small sample size
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Random Allocation, Models, Statistical, Statistical Distributions, Multilevel Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review