CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 808Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MEASURING HAPPINESS WITH A SINGLE-ITEM SCALE

Open access
Abdel-Khalek, Ahmed M.·2006·Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal
DOI 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the accuracy of measuring happiness by a single item (Do you feel happy in general?) answered on an 11-point scale (0–10). Its temporal stability was 0.86. The correlations between the single item and both the Oxford Happiness Inventory (OHI; Argyle, Martin, & Lu, 1995; Hills & Argyle, 1998) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985; Pavot & Diener, 1993) were highly significant and positive, denoting good concurrent validity. Moreover, the single item had a good convergent validity because it was highly and positively correlated with optimism, hope, self-esteem, positive affect, extraversion, and self-ratings of both physical and mental health. Furthermore, the divergent validity of the single item has been adequately demonstrated through its significant and negative correlations with anxiety, pessimism, negative affect, and insomnia. It was concluded that measuring happiness by a single item is reliable, valid, and viable in community surveys as well as in cross-cultural comparisons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Abdel-Khalek A. M., 1998, Journal of the Social Sciences, Kuwait University, 26, 45
  2. Abdel-Khalek A. M., 2003, Derasat Nafsiyah [Psychological Studies], 13, 581
  3. Abdel-Khalek A. M., 1983, Research in Behavior and Personality, 3, 215
  4. Cummins, R. A. & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurements. Proceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, (pp. 74-93) - Singapore: National University of Singapore.
  5. Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology, and psychometrics. London: Routledge.
  6. 10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 808

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Abdel-Khalek, A. M.
Venue
Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal
Publisher
Scientific Journal Publishers Ltd
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
139-150
ISSN
0301-2212 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139
OpenAlex
W1993979851
Cited by
808
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 24
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
happiness measurement, single-item scale, subjective well-being, temporal stability, concurrent validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, Oxford Happiness Inventory, Satisfaction with Life Scale, optimism, hope, self-esteem, positive affect, extraversion, physical and mental health, anxiety, pessimism, negative affect, insomnia, cross-cultural comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review