Cited by 12Workplace Violence and BullyingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Academic Libraries and Toxic Leadership

Open access

Abstract

Toxic leadership has yet to be officially recognized as an area of inquiry in the field of library and information studies. Indeed, the literature on academic libraries is only now beginning to address the topic. None of this should be surprising because leadership, in general, continues to be an under-discussed topic in the library and information studies literature. The topic of leadership, of course, is the central theoretical construct of the leadership studies field, and, in this field, toxic leadership has been systematically studied and discussed. This literature reveals the negative consequences of having a toxic leader as the head of an organization. It suggests that toxic leadership can lead to a decrease in morale and lower productivity in the organization, as well as stress and burnout for an organization’s members. This study, which employed a survey design, documented that the potential consequences of toxic leadership exist in all types of academic libraries across the United States. Of the 492 survey respondents in this study, in fact, 65.4% indicated they had experienced toxic leadership in their professional careers. In addition, an analysis of the answers to the open-ended response questions on the survey—i.e., questions that provided an opportunity for librarians to reveal as much or as little information as they felt comfortable with revealing regarding their toxic leadership experiences—suggested there are five general types of toxic leadership existing…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22371/05.2019.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ortega, A.
Affiliations
University of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Ortega, Alma
Published
2019-01-01
OpenAlex
W2798646177
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Digital USD (University of San Diego) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
toxic leadership, academic libraries, library leadership, abusive supervision, laissez-faire leadership, authoritarian leadership, organizational culture, librarian experiences, burnout, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review