Cited by 40Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Primary Care Medical Education

Open access
Parente, Daniel J.·2024·Family Medicine

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence and large language models are the continuation of a technological revolution in information processing that began with the invention of the transistor in 1947. These technologies, driven by transformer architectures for artificial neural networks, are poised to broadly influence society. It is already apparent that these technologies will be adapted to drive innovation in education. Medical education is a high-risk activity: Information that is incorrectly taught to a student may go unrecognized for years until a relevant clinical situation appears in which that error can lead to patient harm. In this article, I discuss the principal limitations to the use of generative artificial intelligence in medical education—hallucination, bias, cost, and security—and suggest some approaches to confronting these problems. Additionally, I identify the potential applications of generative artificial intelligence to medical education, including personalized instruction, simulation, feedback, evaluation, augmentation of qualitative research, and performance of critical assessment of the existing scientific literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22454/fammed.2024.775525

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Clinical prediction algorithms, machine learning, and AI can yield biased outputs.

    “AI, machine learning, and algorithmic clinical prediction algorithms can produce biased results.[34][35][36][37][38]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [34]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Running all computations locally with on-premises LLMs may improve security by reducing transmission of protected data outside the medical center.

    “Data security may be better accomplished by performing all computations on premises using local LLM strategies (as described previously) to minimize the need to transmit protected information outside of the host medical center.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    If a model lacks knowledge on a question, many LLMs still answer in a confident manner that is not grounded in reality.

    “When asked questions for which the model has no knowledge, many LLMs will, unfortunately, produce replies that appear to be authoritative but are not based in reality.[20][21][22][23]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [20]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Once validated for hallucination and bias, LLMs might lower variable simulation costs by serving as virtual standardized patients or administrators for many students at once at much lower staffing cost.

    “If appropriately validated with respect to hallucination and bias, LLMs could reduce variable costs by acting as virtual standardized patients or virtual simulation administrators for hundreds of students simultaneously at a bare fraction of the personnel costs required to run a simulation on a given day.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Hallucination is a major barrier to using LLMs safely.

    “Hallucination is one of the principal limitations for safe use of LLMs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The author's institution assembled the needed local LLM components for under $3,000, an amount affordable for academic medical centers and small projects.

    “At my institution, we were able to assemble the necessary components for less than $3,000, which is well within the budgets of academic medical centers and small research projects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In multi-turn chats, every turn reprocesses all earlier tokens, so expenses can rise quickly.

    “For multiturn conversations, each turn in the conversation involves processing all previously sent and received tokens.Consequently, these costs can quickly add up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Generative AI may be applied in medical education for personalized teaching, simulation, feedback, evaluation, qualitative research support, and critical appraisal of literature.

    “Additionally, I identify the potential applications of generative artificial intelligence to medical education, including personalized instruction, simulation, feedback, evaluation, augmentation of qualitative research, and performance of critical assessment of the existing scientific literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LLMs are flexible and can be directed to perform tasks including writing, summarizing, logical inference, and programming.

    “Importantly, LLMs appear to be flexible and can be instructed to conduct many tasks, such as text generation, summarization, logical inference, and computer programming.6,[8][9][10][11][12][17][18][19]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Generative AI and LLMs extend a long-running information-processing revolution whose origins lie in the 1947 transistor.

    “Generative artificial intelligence and large language models are the continuation of a technological revolution in information processing that began with the invention of the transistor in 1947.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Medical education carries high risk because wrongly taught material can go unnoticed for years and later harm a patient.

    “Medical education is a high-risk activity: Information that is incorrectly taught to a student may go unrecognized for years until a relevant clinical situation appears in which that error can lead to patient harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Local LLMs trade off performance against closed cloud models like GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, which remain superior.

    “Local LLMs have trade-offs in performance with closedsource cloud models such as OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo, Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus, and Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro, which still provide superior performance.51”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The transformer design removed recurrence from artificial neural networks while still encoding word relationships, which improved parallelism and training speed and allowed very large training sets.

    “The transformer architecture eliminated recurrence from ANNs-without sacrificing the ability to encode sematic relationships between words-thereby allowing marked gains in parallelism and training time, enabling very large data sets to be used for training.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    For LLMs to be widely deployed, they must be accurate, unbiased, affordable, and secure.

    “Widespread deployment of LLMs requires them to be accurate, bias-free, affordable, and secure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLM-based medical education tools should not be trusted until human experts trained to spot structural and systemic bias validate them, so bias is not passed to learners.

    “Before LLM-based systems are trusted for medical education-even those including algorithmic components to mitigate bias-they will require validation by human experts who have training in recognizing structural and systemic biases to avoid unintentionally propagating biases to medical learners via AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The principal constraints on generative AI in medical education are hallucination, bias, expense, and security.

    “In this article, I discuss the principal limitations to the use of generative artificial intelligence in medical education-hallucination, bias, cost, and security-and suggest some approaches to confronting these problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Larger models, in general, yield better performance.

    “Larger models, in general, yield better performance.46”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Simulation is costly to run, and its traditional cost-effectiveness has been questioned.

    “Simulation is nevertheless expensive to administer, and the cost-effectiveness of simulation as traditionally implemented has been questioned.56”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    These technologies are expected to broadly influence society.

    “These technologies, driven by transformer architectures for artificial neural networks, are poised to broadly influence society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These models can hold considerable world knowledge, but that knowledge is finite.

    “Clearly these models can contain much knowledge about the world-but not an unlimited amount.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    GPT-4, the top-performing model, costs 3 cents per 1,000 input tokens and 6 cents per 1,000 output tokens.

    “For the highest performance model, GPT-4, the current price is 3 cents per thousand input tokens and 6 cents per thousand output tokens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    LLMs are trained to perform next-word prediction.

    “LLMs are trained to perform next-word prediction.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Most LLMs have been deployed on cloud-based servers.

    “This has meant that most LLMs have been run on servers using a cloud computing framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    LLMs store a statistical model of human language inside a neural network after processing enormous amounts of training text made possible by transformers.

    “LLMs encode a statistical understanding of human languages within a neural network by analysis of vast volumes of training text enabled by transformer neural networks.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If LLMs were validated to give accurate, unbiased, hallucination-free information at least equal to human teachers, learners could use a personalized virtual tutor and progress at their own level.

    “If LLMs could be validated to provide information that is known to be accurate, free of bias and hallucination-at least as good as human instructors-then students could interact with a personalized virtual tutor and could learn at a pace suitable to their current level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    LLMs used in primary care and medical education need to provide correct information.

    “For LLMs to be used in primary care and medical education, they must supply correct information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The GPT-3.5 model, having 175 billion parameters, is estimated to hold roughly 85 GB of information, about the same as all uncompressed Wikipedia text.

    “For GPT-3.5, with 175 billion parameters, 9 the model likely encodes about 85 gigabytes of data, which is approximately the uncompressed equivalent of all text in Wikipedia.*”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: During LLM training, parameters are usually represented as 16- or 32-bit floating-point numbers.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Reducing parameters to 4 bits each does not cause meaningful performance loss.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Each parameter carries roughly half a byte, which must represent both language structure and world knowledge.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Patient data handled by medical learners fall under HIPAA, and educational records fall under FERPA.

    “Medical learners interact with patient data, which is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).Likewise, educational records are protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    High-quality narrative feedback is hard to produce, and many efforts to improve it fail to improve, sustain, cost-effectively deliver, or generalize.

    “Quality narrative feedback, however, is difficult to achieve, [58][59][60] and many interventions seeking to improve feedback quality do not yield improvement, lack sustainability, are not cost effective, or are not generalizable.[61][62][63]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [58]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [59]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [60]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Even with these difficulties, primary care educators must prepare to use generative AI and LLMs in student and resident training.

    “Despite these problems, primary care medical educators have an imperative to prepare for the use of generative AI and LLMs in medical student and resident education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LLMs may reproduce biases from their training data, though developers are attempting to reduce this.

    “LLMs, too, run the risk of perpetuating biases present in their training data, although measures are being taken by developers to mitigate them.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These tools will require validation to confirm accuracy and reduce the chance that unintended systemic bias reaches learners.

    “Validation will be needed to ensure accuracy of these tools and to minimize the risk of unintentional, systemic bias being transmitted to medical learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
27 of 27
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    During LLM training, parameters are usually represented as 16- or 32-bit floating-point numbers.

    “When LLMs are trained, each parameter is typically expressed in a 16-or 32-bit floating point number.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Reducing parameters to 4 bits each does not cause meaningful performance loss.

    “Experience with LLMs that can be run on local (as opposed to server) hardware, such as the Llama models from Meta, suggests that quantization of the parameters down to merely 4 bits per parameter does not result in significant loss of performance.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each parameter carries roughly half a byte, which must represent both language structure and world knowledge.

    “Thus, each parameter encodes about a halfbyte of data, which must be used to encode information about the structure of human languages and knowledge about the world.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reference 10 gives two different arXiv identifiers

    Minor

    The arXiv identifier printed in reference 10 differs from the identifier in its DOI, so the two identifiers cannot both point to the cited preprint.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N. Attention is all you need, 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017.
  2. Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N. Language models are few-shot learners, 34th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020.
  3. Stiennon N, Ouyang L, Wu J. Learning to summarize with human feedback, 37th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023.
  4. Chen M, Tworek J, Jun H. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv. 2021:2107.03374. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.03374. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Shuster K, Poff S, Chen M, Kiela D, Weston J. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv. 2024:2104.07567. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07567. · DOI
  6. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. National Academies Press; 2003.
  7. Xiao Z, Yuan X, Liao QV, Abdelghani R, Oudeyer PY. Supporting qualitative analysis with large language models: combining codebook with GPT-3 for deductive coding. arXiv. 2023:2304.10548. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10548. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parente, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Parente, Daniel J.
Venue
Family Medicine
Published
2024-10-02
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
534-540
ISSN
  • 0742-3225 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3800
OpenAlex
W4401410647
Cited by
40
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
generative AI, large language models, hallucinations, algorithmic bias, data security, personalized instruction, simulation-based training, feedback, assessment, medical errors
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Education, Medical, Humans, Primary Health Care, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review