Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Primary Care Medical Education
Open accessAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence and large language models are the continuation of a technological revolution in information processing that began with the invention of the transistor in 1947. These technologies, driven by transformer architectures for artificial neural networks, are poised to broadly influence society. It is already apparent that these technologies will be adapted to drive innovation in education. Medical education is a high-risk activity: Information that is incorrectly taught to a student may go unrecognized for years until a relevant clinical situation appears in which that error can lead to patient harm. In this article, I discuss the principal limitations to the use of generative artificial intelligence in medical education—hallucination, bias, cost, and security—and suggest some approaches to confronting these problems. Additionally, I identify the potential applications of generative artificial intelligence to medical education, including personalized instruction, simulation, feedback, evaluation, augmentation of qualitative research, and performance of critical assessment of the existing scientific literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Clinical prediction algorithms, machine learning, and AI can yield biased outputs.
“AI, machine learning, and algorithmic clinical prediction algorithms can produce biased results.[34][35][36][37][38]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [34]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Running all computations locally with on-premises LLMs may improve security by reducing transmission of protected data outside the medical center.
“Data security may be better accomplished by performing all computations on premises using local LLM strategies (as described previously) to minimize the need to transmit protected information outside of the host medical center.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
If a model lacks knowledge on a question, many LLMs still answer in a confident manner that is not grounded in reality.
“When asked questions for which the model has no knowledge, many LLMs will, unfortunately, produce replies that appear to be authoritative but are not based in reality.[20][21][22][23]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Once validated for hallucination and bias, LLMs might lower variable simulation costs by serving as virtual standardized patients or administrators for many students at once at much lower staffing cost.
“If appropriately validated with respect to hallucination and bias, LLMs could reduce variable costs by acting as virtual standardized patients or virtual simulation administrators for hundreds of students simultaneously at a bare fraction of the personnel costs required to run a simulation on a given day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Hallucination is a major barrier to using LLMs safely.
“Hallucination is one of the principal limitations for safe use of LLMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisecitation
Meta's Llama 3 70-billion-parameter local model is at least competitive in performance with those cloud models.
“At least one opensource, local LLM (Meta's recently released Llama 3 70 billion parameter model) is, however, performance-competitive with these models.51”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
After training, LLMs can produce text that appears convincingly human.
“Once trained, LLMs can be used to generate text that is convincingly humanlike.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reducing parameter precision from 16 bits to 4 bits has allowed 33-billion-parameter models to fit within 24 GB of video memory.
“Groundbreaking experimental and theoretical work on quantizing the parameters from a 16-bit number (ranging from 0 to 65536) into a 4-bit number (ranging from 0 to 15) has been able to fit medium-sized models-those with 33 billion parameters-into 24 gigabytes of video RAM.[46][47][48]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [46]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Cloud computing requires sending data from the academic medical center to an outside vendor.
“When cloud computing is used, data must be transmitted outside of an academic medical center to a third party (eg, OpenAI or Google).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Legal uncertainty remains about copyrighted material in LLM training and use.
“Moreover, there are outstanding legal questions related to the use of copyrighted material during the training and use of LLMs (exemplified by the ongoing lawsuit between The New York Times Company and OpenAI).54”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Health outcomes for disadvantaged and minority groups have been harmed by historical and structural forces.
“Historical and structural factors have negatively influenced health care outcomes for disadvantaged and minority populations.25,26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A key hallucination risk is that a learner asks a technical question and receives a confident incorrect answer, leading to false learning.
“The risk of hallucination is that a student will ask a specific technical question to which the LLM will supply a confident but wrong answer, thereby causing mislearning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Standard didactic teaching targets the average learner, which inevitably shortchanges both advanced students and those having difficulty.
“Current didactic approaches to medical education require an instructor to deliver content that is understood by most learners.These strategies must, unavoidably, yield suboptimal outcomes both for learners who are more advanced and for those who are struggling with the material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
LLMs can directly store substantial world knowledge because they contain billions of parameters.
“Because LLMs have billions of parameters, they can encode a large amount of information about the world within the models directly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
LLMs are computationally demanding models needing hardware with many parallel processors and large memory.
“LLMs are computationally intensive mathematical models that require computing hardware with many parallel processing units and many gigabytes of memory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Faculty may lack time for constructive narrative feedback because compensation and care models prioritize clinical output over teaching.
“Moreover, faculty physicians may not have time to write constructive, narrative feedback for students because of care and compensation models that emphasize clinical productivity to the detriment of medical education.64,65”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [64]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Administrative burden is a major source of burnout for academic physicians.
“Advances in AI automation of administrative tasks also should be employed to reduce the burden of administrative tasks, a key contributor to burnout among academic physicians.71”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Qualitative medical education data often require a coding step that is laborious and time-consuming for coders.
“Many such responses must undergo a coding process, which is laborious and time-intensive for the coders.67”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LLMs can speed up monitoring and reviewing of academic literature, including in primary care and medical education.
“LLMs can accelerate the surveillance and review of the academic literature, including as it relates to primary care and medical education.70”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70]
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 16
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe author's institution assembled the needed local LLM components for under $3,000, an amount affordable for academic medical centers and small projects.
“At my institution, we were able to assemble the necessary components for less than $3,000, which is well within the budgets of academic medical centers and small research projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIn multi-turn chats, every turn reprocesses all earlier tokens, so expenses can rise quickly.
“For multiturn conversations, each turn in the conversation involves processing all previously sent and received tokens.Consequently, these costs can quickly add up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI may be applied in medical education for personalized teaching, simulation, feedback, evaluation, qualitative research support, and critical appraisal of literature.
“Additionally, I identify the potential applications of generative artificial intelligence to medical education, including personalized instruction, simulation, feedback, evaluation, augmentation of qualitative research, and performance of critical assessment of the existing scientific literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs are flexible and can be directed to perform tasks including writing, summarizing, logical inference, and programming.
“Importantly, LLMs appear to be flexible and can be instructed to conduct many tasks, such as text generation, summarization, logical inference, and computer programming.6,[8][9][10][11][12][17][18][19]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGenerative AI and LLMs extend a long-running information-processing revolution whose origins lie in the 1947 transistor.
“Generative artificial intelligence and large language models are the continuation of a technological revolution in information processing that began with the invention of the transistor in 1947.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMedical education carries high risk because wrongly taught material can go unnoticed for years and later harm a patient.
“Medical education is a high-risk activity: Information that is incorrectly taught to a student may go unrecognized for years until a relevant clinical situation appears in which that error can lead to patient harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLocal LLMs trade off performance against closed cloud models like GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, which remain superior.
“Local LLMs have trade-offs in performance with closedsource cloud models such as OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo, Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus, and Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro, which still provide superior performance.51”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe transformer design removed recurrence from artificial neural networks while still encoding word relationships, which improved parallelism and training speed and allowed very large training sets.
“The transformer architecture eliminated recurrence from ANNs-without sacrificing the ability to encode sematic relationships between words-thereby allowing marked gains in parallelism and training time, enabling very large data sets to be used for training.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFor LLMs to be widely deployed, they must be accurate, unbiased, affordable, and secure.
“Widespread deployment of LLMs requires them to be accurate, bias-free, affordable, and secure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningLLM-based medical education tools should not be trusted until human experts trained to spot structural and systemic bias validate them, so bias is not passed to learners.
“Before LLM-based systems are trusted for medical education-even those including algorithmic components to mitigate bias-they will require validation by human experts who have training in recognizing structural and systemic biases to avoid unintentionally propagating biases to medical learners via AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe principal constraints on generative AI in medical education are hallucination, bias, expense, and security.
“In this article, I discuss the principal limitations to the use of generative artificial intelligence in medical education-hallucination, bias, cost, and security-and suggest some approaches to confronting these problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLarger models, in general, yield better performance.
“Larger models, in general, yield better performance.46”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSimulation is costly to run, and its traditional cost-effectiveness has been questioned.
“Simulation is nevertheless expensive to administer, and the cost-effectiveness of simulation as traditionally implemented has been questioned.56”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese technologies are expected to broadly influence society.
“These technologies, driven by transformer architectures for artificial neural networks, are poised to broadly influence society.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese models can hold considerable world knowledge, but that knowledge is finite.
“Clearly these models can contain much knowledge about the world-but not an unlimited amount.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenGPT-4, the top-performing model, costs 3 cents per 1,000 input tokens and 6 cents per 1,000 output tokens.
“For the highest performance model, GPT-4, the current price is 3 cents per thousand input tokens and 6 cents per thousand output tokens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLLMs are trained to perform next-word prediction.
“LLMs are trained to perform next-word prediction.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningMost LLMs have been deployed on cloud-based servers.
“This has meant that most LLMs have been run on servers using a cloud computing framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLLMs store a statistical model of human language inside a neural network after processing enormous amounts of training text made possible by transformers.
“LLMs encode a statistical understanding of human languages within a neural network by analysis of vast volumes of training text enabled by transformer neural networks.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf LLMs were validated to give accurate, unbiased, hallucination-free information at least equal to human teachers, learners could use a personalized virtual tutor and progress at their own level.
“If LLMs could be validated to provide information that is known to be accurate, free of bias and hallucination-at least as good as human instructors-then students could interact with a personalized virtual tutor and could learn at a pace suitable to their current level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisenone givenLLMs used in primary care and medical education need to provide correct information.
“For LLMs to be used in primary care and medical education, they must supply correct information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe GPT-3.5 model, having 175 billion parameters, is estimated to hold roughly 85 GB of information, about the same as all uncompressed Wikipedia text.
“For GPT-3.5, with 175 billion parameters, 9 the model likely encodes about 85 gigabytes of data, which is approximately the uncompressed equivalent of all text in Wikipedia.*”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: During LLM training, parameters are usually represented as 16- or 32-bit floating-point numbers.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Reducing parameters to 4 bits each does not cause meaningful performance loss.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Each parameter carries roughly half a byte, which must represent both language structure and world knowledge.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPatient data handled by medical learners fall under HIPAA, and educational records fall under FERPA.
“Medical learners interact with patient data, which is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).Likewise, educational records are protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh-quality narrative feedback is hard to produce, and many efforts to improve it fail to improve, sustain, cost-effectively deliver, or generalize.
“Quality narrative feedback, however, is difficult to achieve, [58][59][60] and many interventions seeking to improve feedback quality do not yield improvement, lack sustainability, are not cost effective, or are not generalizable.[61][62][63]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [58]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [60]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEven with these difficulties, primary care educators must prepare to use generative AI and LLMs in student and resident training.
“Despite these problems, primary care medical educators have an imperative to prepare for the use of generative AI and LLMs in medical student and resident education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs may reproduce biases from their training data, though developers are attempting to reduce this.
“LLMs, too, run the risk of perpetuating biases present in their training data, although measures are being taken by developers to mitigate them.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese tools will require validation to confirm accuracy and reduce the chance that unintended systemic bias reaches learners.
“Validation will be needed to ensure accuracy of these tools and to minimize the risk of unintentional, systemic bias being transmitted to medical learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
During LLM training, parameters are usually represented as 16- or 32-bit floating-point numbers.
“When LLMs are trained, each parameter is typically expressed in a 16-or 32-bit floating point number.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Reducing parameters to 4 bits each does not cause meaningful performance loss.
“Experience with LLMs that can be run on local (as opposed to server) hardware, such as the Llama models from Meta, suggests that quantization of the parameters down to merely 4 bits per parameter does not result in significant loss of performance.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each parameter carries roughly half a byte, which must represent both language structure and world knowledge.
“Thus, each parameter encodes about a halfbyte of data, which must be used to encode information about the structure of human languages and knowledge about the world.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies suggest that AI tools can reduce educator workload, improve efficiency, and alleviate burnout.
“Previous studies suggest that AI tools can reduce educator workload, improve efficiency, and alleviate burnout [46].”
From Development of a Clinical Clerkship Mentor Using Generative AI and Evaluation of Its Effectiveness in a Medical Student Trial Compared to Student Mentors: 2-Part Comparative Study (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
In “Embracing Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education” (page unavailable), the paper recommends AI automation to reduce administrative burden, which it identifies as a contributor to burnout among academic physicians. The “Simulation” section (page unavailable) describes potential time savings for faculty and notes efficiency gains from human–AI tools, but it does not report studies showing that AI has reduced educator workload or alleviated burnout. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredChatGPT-based virtual patient tools have demonstrated strong usability.
“Similarly, ChatGPT-based virtual patient tools have demonstrated strong usability [46].”
From Development of a Clinical Clerkship Mentor Using Generative AI and Evaluation of Its Effectiveness in a Medical Student Trial Compared to Student Mentors: 2-Part Comparative Study (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
The Simulation section proposes that LLMs could act as virtual standardized patients and calls for pilot simulations to be developed and validated. It does not report an evaluation of ChatGPT-based virtual patient tools or demonstrate strong usability; no page number was provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reference 10 gives two different arXiv identifiers
MinorThe arXiv identifier printed in reference 10 differs from the identifier in its DOI, so the two identifiers cannot both point to the cited preprint.
“arXiv. 2023:2302.07730.”
“https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.10005.”
Cites
Kaugeranna, R., Kaugeranna, E., & Aion, (. S. 4. 6. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.giscience.2023.43 · Cited by 13,695 · see citing works
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,726 · see citing works
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131 · see citing works
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · see citing works
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions
Bailey, Z. D., Krieger, N., Agénor, M., Graves, J., Linos, N., & Bassett, M. T. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30569-x · Cited by 5,203 · see citing works
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208 · see citing works
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., ChatGPT, Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643 · Cited by 4,115 · see citing works
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115 · see citing works
The “All of Us” Research Program
The All of Us Research Program Investigators (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr1809937 · Cited by 2,440 · see citing works
Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.11916 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement
Sjoding, M. W., Dickson, R. P., Iwashyna, T. J., Gay, S. E., & Valley, T. S. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2029240 · Cited by 1,114 · see citing works
The “All of Us” Research Program
Sullivan, F., McKinstry, B., & Vasishta, S. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc1912496 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Recipes for Building an Open-Domain Chatbot
Roller, S., Dinan, E., Goyal, N., Ju, D., Williamson, M., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Ott, M., Smith, E. M., Boureau, Y.-L., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.24 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-TrainingPreprint
Neelakantan, A., Xu, T., Puri, R., Radford, A., Han, J. M., Tworek, J., Yuan, Q.-M., Tezak, N., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., et al. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.10005 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings
Irby, D. M. (1995) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14314 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Large language models and the perils of their hallucinations
Azamfirei, R., Kudchadkar, S. R., & Fackler, J. C. (2023) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04393-x · Cited by 324 · see citing works
The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot
Peng, S., Kalliamvakou, E., Cihon, P., & Demirer, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.06590 · Cited by 287 · cited 1× · see citing works
“57 I call on the primary care research community to develop pilot LLM-based simulations, validate themwithrespecttohallucinationandbias,andsubjectthemto economiccost-benefitanalysistodeterminetheirperformance compared to (a) traditional simulation, and (b) other teaching methods (eg, didactic…”
Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review
Mapes, B. M., Foster, C. S., Kusnoor, S. V., Epelbaum, M. I., AuYoung, M., Jenkins, G., Lopez-Class, M., Richardson-Heron, D., Elmi, A., Surkan, K., et al. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234962 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
An algorithmic approach to reducing unexplained pain disparities in underserved populations
Pierson, E., Cutler, D. M., Leskovec, J., Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01192-7 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Rao, S. K., Kimball, A. B., Lehrhoff, S. R., Hidrue, M. K., Colton, D. G., Ferris, T. G., & Torchiana, D. F. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001461 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphology
Zmigrod, R., Mielke, S. J., Wallach, H., & Cotterell, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1161 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Kim, J. K., Chua, M., Rickard, M., & Lorenzo, A. (2023) · Journal of Pediatric Urology · doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.018 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Breaking the Silence: Time to Talk About Race and Racism
Acosta, D., & Ackerman-Barger, K. W. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001416 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers
Frantar, E., Ashkboos, S., Hoefler, T., & Alistarh, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.17323 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Models
Webster, K., Wang, X., Tenney, I., Beutel, A., Pitler, E., Pavlick, E., Chen, J., Chi, E., & Petrov, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06032 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying
Maleki, N., Padmanabhan, B., & Dutta, K. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00033 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Issues of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for simulation in health professions education
Maloney, S. R., & Haines, T. P. (2016) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0020-3 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
van de Ridder, J. M. M., McGaghie, W. C., Stokking, K. M., & ten Cate, O. T. J. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12744 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Harding, G., Gantley, M., & Taylor, K. A. (2001) · doi:10.1201/b12652-43 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of Medical Simulation in Teaching Medical Students Critical Care Medicine
Beal, M., Kinnear, J., Anderson, C. R., Martin, T. D., Wamboldt, R., & Hooper, L. (2016) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000189 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Assessing Quality and Costs of Education in the Ambulatory Setting
Bowen, J. L., & Irby, D. M. (2002) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200207000-00006 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
In Search of a Better Equation — Performance and Equity in Estimates of Kidney Function
Diao, J. A., Inker, L. A., Levey, A. S., Tighiouart, H., Powe, N. R., & Manrai, A. K. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2028243 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Contrastive Learning Reduces Hallucination in ConversationsPreprint
Sun, W., Shi, Z., Gao, S., et al. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10400 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Cary, M. P., Zink, A., Wei, S., Olson, A., Yan, M., Senior, R., Bessias, S., Gadhoumi, K., Jean-Pierre, G., Wang, D., et al. (2023) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00553 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Dillon, E. C., Tai‐Seale, M., Meehan, A. E., Martin, V., Nordgren, R., Lee, T., Nauenberg, T., & Frosch, D. L. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05381-0 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Student-Led Efforts to Advance Anti-Racist Medical Education
Afolabi, T., Borowsky, H. M., Cordero, D. M., Paul, D. W., Said, J. T., Sandoval, R. S., Davis, D. L. F., Ölveczky, D. D., & Chatterjee, A. (2021) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004043 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Evolution of technology in teaching: Blackboard and beyond in Medical Education
Muttappallymyalil, J., Mendis, S., John, L. J., et al. (2016) · Nepal Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.3126/nje.v6i3.15870 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Contrastive Learning Reduces Hallucination in Conversations
Sun, W., Shi, Z., Gao, S., Ren, P., De Rijke, M., & Ren, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26596 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The Potential For Bias In Machine Learning And Opportunities For Health Insurers To Address It
Gervasi, S. S., Chen, I. Y., Smith–McLallen, A., Sontag, D. A., Obermeyer, Z., Vennera, M., & Chawla, R. (2022) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01287 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Pelgrim, E. A. M., Kramer, A. W. M., Mokkink, H. G. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-12-97 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Quality, Accuracy, and Bias in ChatGPT-Based Summarization of Medical Abstracts
Hake, J., Crowley, M., Coy, A., Shanks, D., Eoff, A., Kirmer-Voss, K., Dhanda, G., & Parente, D. J. (2024) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.3075 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationDanilovich, N., Kitto, S. C., Price, D. W., Campbell, C. B., Hodgson, A., & HENDRY, P. J. (2021) · Family Medicine · doi:10.22454/fammed.2021.453158 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 1—How to interview
Jordan, J., Clarke, S., & Coates, W. C. (2021) · AEM Education and Training · doi:10.1002/aet2.10646 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Even with ChatGPT, race matters
Amin, K., Forman, H. P., & Davis, M. A. (2024) · Clinical Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110113 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The Need for Anti-Racism Training in Medical School Curricula
Ahmad, N. J., & Shi, M. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001806 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Technological Revolutions: Ethics and Policy in the Dark
Bostrom, N. (2007) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1002/9780470165874.ch10 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Transformer models: an introduction and catalogPreprint
Amatriain, X., Sankar, A., Bing, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.07730 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Brooks, K. C. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2879 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The All of Us Research Program
(2018) · The Nurse Practitioner · doi:10.1097/01.npr.0000541472.39043.62 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Freeman, J. (2020) · Family Medicine · doi:10.22454/fammed.2020.140670 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Bradley, E. A., Winchester, D. E., Alfonso, C. E., Carpenter, A. J., Cohen, M. S., Coleman, D. M., Jacob, M. S., Jneid, H. M., Leal, M. A., Mahmoud, Z., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001093 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Feedback on Feedback as a Faculty Development Tool
Warm, E. J., Kelleher, M., Kinnear, B., et al. (2018) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-17-00876.1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement
(2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmx210003 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Why ChatGPT Should Not Be Used to Write Academic Scientific Manuscripts for Publication
(2023) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2982 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Systemic Racism and Health Disparities: A Statement from Editors of Family Medicine Journals
Sexton (2020) · The Journal of Family Practice · doi:10.12788/jfp.0088 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth ClarifyingPreprint
Maleki, N., Padmanabhan, B., & Dutta, K. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.06796 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Racism Education is Needed at All Levels of Training
Washington, J. C., & Rodríguez, J. E. (2018) · Family Medicine · doi:10.22454/fammed.2018.424750 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsPreprint
Meade, N., Poole-Dayan, E., & Reddy, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08527 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Measuring Latent Trust Patterns in Large Language Models in the Context of Human-AI Teaming
Koehl, D., & Vangsness, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192869 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Systemic Racism and Health Disparities: A Statement From Editors of Family Medicine Journals
Sexton, S. M., Richardson, C. R., Schrager, S., et al. (2021) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200579 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N. Attention is all you need, 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017.
- Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N. Language models are few-shot learners, 34th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020.
- Stiennon N, Ouyang L, Wu J. Learning to summarize with human feedback, 37th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023.
- Chen M, Tworek J, Jun H. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv. 2021:2107.03374. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.03374. · DOI · Paper page
- Shuster K, Poff S, Chen M, Kiela D, Weston J. Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. arXiv. 2024:2104.07567. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07567. · DOI
- Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. National Academies Press; 2003.
- Xiao Z, Yuan X, Liao QV, Abdelghani R, Oudeyer PY. Supporting qualitative analysis with large language models: combining codebook with GPT-3 for deductive coding. arXiv. 2023:2304.10548. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10548. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative artificial intelligence in healthcare simulation-based education: A scoping review
Neo, N. W. S., Gunawan, J., Levett-Jones, T., Khoo, E. T., Chua, W. L., & Liaw, S. Y. (2025) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101819 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ebihara, H., Kasai, H., Shimizu, I., Shikino, K., Tajima, H., Kimura, Y., & Ito, S. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/76702 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Given that it is easy to develop, customize, and implement, AI-CCM can support students during CCs. Previous studies suggest that AI tools can reduce educator workload, improve efficiency, and alleviate burnout [46].”
- Authors
- Parente, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Parente, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Parente, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Family Medicine
- Published
- 2024-10-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 534-540
- ISSN
- 0742-3225 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3800
- PMC
- PMC11493110
- OpenAlex
- W4401410647
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- generative AI, large language models, hallucinations, algorithmic bias, data security, personalized instruction, simulation-based training, feedback, assessment, medical errors
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Education, Medical, Humans, Primary Health Care, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review