CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language learning aptitude in older adults

Roehr-Brackin, Karen, Loaiza, Vanessa, Pavlekovic, Renato·2023·Journal of the European Second Language Association
DOI 10.22599/jesla.93
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22599/jesla.93

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 2013, Foreign language training as cognitive therapy for age-related cognitive decline: A hypothesis for future research, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 2689, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.004 · DOI
  2. 2020, Probing the internal validity of the LLAMA l anguage aptitude tests, Language Learning, 70, 11, 10.1111/lang.12368 · DOI
  3. 1962, Training research and education, 87
  4. 1990, Language aptitude reconsidered, 11
  5. 1959, The Modern Language Aptitude Test
  6. 2002, Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT
  7. 2017, Explicit instruction, bilingualism, and the older adult learner, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 29, 10.1017/S0272263115000364 · DOI
  8. 2019, Multilingualism in older age: A research agenda from the cognitive perspective, Language Teaching, 52, 360, 10.1017/S0261444819000193 · DOI
  9. 2015, Deconstructing PI for the ages: Explicit instruction vs. practice in young and older adult bilinguals, IRAL, 53, 225
  10. 2003, The handbook of second language acquisition, 313
  11. 1994, Consciousness in second language learning: Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition, AILA Review, 11, 37
  12. 2018, Third age learners of foreign languages
  13. 2013, Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment, 105
  14. 2013, Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment, 179
  15. 2016, Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study, Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 577, 10.1017/S0142716415000120 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2020, Implicit language aptitude
  17. 1980, Complexity of life style and maintenance of intellectual abilities, Journal of Social Issues, 36, 47, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02021.x · DOI
  18. 2010, Implicit learning as an ability, Cognition, 116, 321, 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2018, Third age learners of foreign languages, 48
  20. 2021, Cognitive and socioaffective predictors of L2 microdevelopment in late adulthood: A longitudinal intervention study, Modern Language Journal, 105, 237, 10.1111/modl.12696 · DOI
  21. 2011, Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism, 73
  22. 2015, The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research, Applied Linguistics, 36, 385, 10.1093/applin/amu054 · DOI
  23. 2016, The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801, 10.1017/S027226311500042X · DOI
  24. 2021, Implicit language aptitude: Conceptualizing the construct, validating the measures, and examining the evidence, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 473, 10.1017/S0272263121000024 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2005, LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests
  26. 2019, The LLAMA tests v.3
  27. 2021, Language neutrality of the LLAMA test explored: The case of agglutinative languages and multiple writing systems, Journal of the European Second Language Association, 5, 87, 10.22599/jesla.71 · DOI
  28. 2018, Foreign language learning in the third age: A pilot feasibility study on cognitive, socio-affective and linguistic drivers and benefits in relation to previous bilingualism of the learner, Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2, 1, 10.22599/jesla.36 · DOI
  29. 2018, Third age learners of foreign languages, 108
  30. 2014, How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research, Language Learning, 64, 878, 10.1111/lang.12079 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2016, Language teaching and the older adult: The significance of experience
  32. 2013, Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research, Language Learning, 63, 595, 10.1111/lang.12010 · DOI
  33. 2021, The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing, 147
  34. 2022, Explicit and implicit knowledge and learning of an additional language: A research agenda, Language Teaching, 1, 10.1017/S026144482200026X · DOI
  35. 2021, Are individual differences in cognitive abilities and stylistic preferences related to multilingual adults’ performance in explicit learning conditions?, Language Awareness, 30, 391, 10.1080/09658416.2021.1969404 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2016, Testing aptitude: Investigating Meara’s (2005) LLAMA tests, EuroSLA Yearbook, 16, 179, 10.1075/eurosla.16.07rog · DOI
  37. 2017, Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests, Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1, 49, 10.22599/jesla.24 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2004, What and when of cognitive aging, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140, 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00293.x · DOI
  39. 2018, Third age learners of foreign languages, 19
  40. 2004, Language acquisition: The age factor
  41. 1998, A cognitive approach to language learning
  42. 2002, Individual differences and instructed language learning, 69
  43. 2017, The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes, Language Learning, 67, 747, 10.1111/lang.12241 · DOI
  44. Tomak, I. (2019). Contributions of type of instruction, individual differences in cognitive ability and age to the development of explicit and implicit knowledge of L2 English articles: A study with Russian learners of English. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.
  45. 2017, Maintaining cognitive functioning in healthy seniors with a technology-based foreign language program: A pilot feasibility study, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 1
  46. 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Roehr-Brackin, K., Loaiza, V., & Pavlekovic, R.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Publisher
White Rose University Press
Published
2023
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
2399-9101
DOI
10.22599/jesla.93
Cited by
5
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review