The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology
Abstract
When Chris Dede from Harvard University visited the University of Illinois to deliver an address at the inauguration of the Ubiquitous Learning Institute [1] on 7 April 2010 [2], given that Dr Dede was a member of the National Education Technology Plan technical working group [3], we took the opportunity to plan a special issue of E-Learning and Digital Media devoted to a discussion of the national plan. To this end we invited contributions from a number of prominent scholars and invited Chris to organize a response from members of the working group to their comments and criticisms. As the Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan notes in his letter to members of Congress that prefaces the report that America used to be the global leader in education completion rates for young people and now ranks ninth out of 36 developed nations. He argues it is essential therefore that it regains its leadership, enabling it to compete in the global economy. If anything, this message has become even more important in the intervening months as the effects of the recession have become widespread, with unemployment peaking at over 10% and a strong demand to control the burgeoning deficit through budget cuts to government services and welfare across the board. The Obama administration’s National Education Technology Plan, Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology, is presented as a means to ‘leverage the innovation and ingenuity’ required to improve student learning and to accelerate the adoption and use of effective technology practices in America’s schools. Duncan goes on to summarize the model of learning at the heart of the plan as follows:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,107
The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811311500307 · Cited by 1,638
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.668938 · Cited by 1,561
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6 · Cited by 1,019
Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020 · Cited by 959
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, M. A., & Araya, D.
- Venue
- E-Learning and Digital Media
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-105
- ISSN
- 1741-8887 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-7530
- OpenAlex
- W2345495256
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 222.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2304/elea.2011.8.2.102
- The paper
- Peters, M. A., & Araya, D. (2011). Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2011.8.2.102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.