The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this research was to explore how technology can be used to teach technological skills and to determine what benefit flipping the classroom might have for students taking an introductory-level college course on spreadsheets in terms of student achievement and satisfaction with the class. A pretest posttest quasi-experimental mixed methods design was utilized to determine any differences in student achievement that might be associated with the instructional approach being used. In addition, the scalability of each approach was evaluated along with students’ perceptions of these approaches to determine the affect each intervention might have on a student’s motivation to learn. The simulation-based instruction tested in this study was found to be an extremely scalable solution but less effective than the regular classroom and flipped classroom approaches in terms of student learning. While students did demonstrate learning gains, the process focus of the simulation’s instruction and assessments frustrated students and decreased their motivation to learn. Students’ attitudes towards the topic, their willingness to refer the course to others, and the likelihood that they would take another course like this were considerably lower than those of students in the flipped or regular classroom situations. The results of this study support the conclusion that a technology enhanced flipped classroom was both effective and scalable; it better facilitated learning than the simulation-based training and students found this approach to be more motivating in that it allowed for greater differentiation of instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · Cited by 4,849
Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220480009596759 · Cited by 2,774
The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs
Bonk, C. J., Graham, C. R., Cross, J., & Moore, M. G. (2005) · Cited by 2,583
Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions
Graham, C. R. (2006) · Cited by 1,767
How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation
Strayer, J. F. (2012) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4 · Cited by 1,621
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2014) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5 · Cited by 1,475
Handbook of Formative Assessment
Andrade, H. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851 · Cited by 663
Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology
Peters, M. A., & Araya, D. (2011) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.2304/elea.2011.8.2.102 · Cited by 585
Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators
Oliver, M. (2011) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.549829 · Cited by 487
Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O'Dowd, D. K. (2010) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063 · Cited by 396
Cited by
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 2,152
A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12548 · Cited by 581
Kong, S. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009 · Cited by 580
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314 · Cited by 526
Yilmaz, R. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085 · Cited by 514
“When studies on motivation in FC environments are examined, it is seen that FC model of instruction is more efficient in ensuring motivation compared to traditional methods of learning (Chao, Chen, & Chuang, 2015; Chen et al., 2014; Davies, Dean, & Ball, 2013; Strayer, 2012; Turan, 2015).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N.
- Venue
- Educational Technology Research and Development
- Published
- 2013-06-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-580
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2093679280
- Cited by
- 1,019
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 319.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
- The paper
- Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.