The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observations on the Development of Visually-Directed Reaching
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a normative study of the development of visually-directed prehension during the first six months of life. Thirty-four normal infants born and reared under relatively uniform conditions in a state hospital were studied. The technique combined detailed longitudinal observations with a standardized testing procedure designed to elicit visual-motor responses including prehension. A sequence of development is described, categorized into eight stages of two weeks each. A number of separate and distinct visualmotor and tactual motor behaviors were found to contribute to this sequence, culminating in the development of visually-directed reaching just prior to 5 months of age. The prehensory abilities of man and other primates have long been regarded as one of the most significant evolutionary developments peculiar to this vertebrate group (2, 17). In man, the development of prehension is linked phylogenetically with the assumption of erect posture (thus freeing the forelimbs from the service of locomotion), the highly refined development of binocular vision, and the possession of an opposable thumb, among other specializations. One important accompaniment of the development of prehension is man's unique capacity to make and utilize tools. Considering the acknowledged importance of these developments in phylogeny, it is surprising how little is presently known about the ontogeny of prehension in
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins of intelligence in children.
Piaget, J. (1952) · doi:10.1037/11494-000 · Cited by 10,687
Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior.
Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040546 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationAdaptation of Disarranged Hand-Eye Coordination Contingent upon Re-Afferent Stimulation
Held, R., & Hein, A. V. (1958) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.87 · Cited by 291
Self-citation
Cited by
Mirror self-image reactions before age two
Amsterdam, B. (1972) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.420050403 · Cited by 811
Mirror neurons: from origin to function
Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13000903 · Cited by 647
The Transition to Reaching: Mapping Intention and Intrinsic Dynamics
Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., Kamm, K., Spencer, J. P., Schneider, K., & Zernicke, R. F. (1993) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04188.x · Cited by 538
Eye-hand coordination in the newborn.
von Hofsten, C. (1982) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.18.3.450 · Cited by 494
Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus
Ray, E., & Heyes, C. (2011) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00961.x · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- White, B. L., Castle, P., & Held, R.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1964-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032045505
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.