Cited by 39Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

Cultural and Sexual Differences on the Judgment of Criminal Offenses: A Replication Study of the Measurement of Delinquency

Hsu, Marlene·1973·The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)

Abstract

In 1964, Sellin and Wolfgang1 proposed a new method of measuring criminality by using a differential weighting ot the seriousness of criminal offenses. They believe that there is a quantitative aspect of criminality which is measurable by ratings, and that the scores of ratings represent an underlying value judgment of a community. This rating of the seriousness of criminal offenses, they claim, makes possible meaningful quantitive comparisons of the crime rates in different times and places. By asking raters, including college students, policemen and judges in Philadelphia, to judge the seriousness of some criminal offenses, Sellin and Wolfgang were able to construct a seriousness scale which they believe reflects fairly universal attitudes toward criminal acts, especially in the Western cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1142378

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hsu (1973) found that female students in Taiwan in 1968 rated rape as more serious, while males rated homicide as more serious.

    “Hsu (1973) found that female students in Taiwan in 1968 rated rape as more serious, while the males rated homicide as more serious.”

    From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Hsu (1973)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Marlene
Venue
The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-)
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1973-09
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
348
ISSN
0091-4169 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W578062196
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) (publishedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
delinquency measurement, cultural differences, sexual difference, public attitudes toward crime, replication study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review