The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison Of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, And Individualistic Learning
Abstract
The effects of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic instruction were compared on achievement, student-student interaction, and attitudes. Seventy-four eighth-grade students were randomly assigned to conditions, stratifying for sex and ability. Computer-assisted cooperative instruction promoted greater quantity and quality of daily achievement, more successful problem solving, more task-related student-student interaction, and increased the perceived status of female students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47 · Cited by 1,588
Self-citation
Cited by
Where's the evidence that active learning works?
Michael, J. (2006) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006 · Cited by 1,648
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223 · Cited by 837
Self-citationSmall Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543071003449 · Cited by 721
Cooperation and the Use of Technology
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410609519-41 · Cited by 518
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 382-382
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121637595
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
