The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adolescent Self-Concept: Testing the Assumption of Equivalent Structure across Gender
Abstract
This study tested the invariance of a multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept (SC) structure for adolescent males and females. In a covariance structure analysis of data from a sample of 832 (412 males, 420 females) grade 11 and 12 students, with multiple measures of general, academic, English, and mathematics SC facets, SC structure differed for males and females. Although the number of SC factors, pattern of factor loadings (except for one), and hierarchical structure were invariant across gender, relations among the factors differed. These structural differences derived largely from the differential way in which English and mathematics SC related to the other SC facets, and to grades, for each sex. In addition, significant gender differences were found in the reliability of certain measurement scales, and correlated errors of measurement were more prevalent for males than for females. The study has important implications for substantive research that focuses on the comparison of SCs across groups and, in particular, across gender.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543046003407 · Cited by 4,164
Self-citationSimultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291366 · Cited by 2,051
The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices
HOELTER, J. W. (1983) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124183011003003 · Cited by 1,624
Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291393 · Cited by 1,481
On the Meaning of within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208993 · Cited by 526 · cited 1×
“We agree with Fornell (1983) and Gerbing and Anderson (1984) that allowing error covariances should not be motivated by goodness-of-fit improvement unless justified on theoretical or methodological grounds.”
Background
Cited by
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810031002 · Cited by 7,997
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456 · Cited by 4,115
Self-citationMarsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · Cited by 1,198
Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997) · The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. · doi:10.1037/10222-009 · Cited by 1,146
Metadata
- Authors
- Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170143291
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adolescent Self-Concept: Testing the Assumption of Equivalent Structure across Gender. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1163115
- The paper
- Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Adolescent Self-Concept: Testing the Assumption of Equivalent Structure across Gender. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
