The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memory Structures and Learning Outcomes
Abstract
Two general categories of learning outcomes—retention and transfer of learning—continue to command the attention of investigators of human learning, as well as of practitioners of instructional design and delivery. Relations between instructional variables and these learning outcomes have been studied over many years. Although some forms of learning theory support the formulation of hypotheses in terms of a two-element paradigm such as Instruction Learning Outcome, cogni tive theorists have tended to consider such a construction unacceptably simple. Modern learning theories of the "information-processing " vari ety have given new emphasis and meaning to the latter view (Estes, 1975). These theories support the basic notion that the effects of instruc tion may best be understood by exploring the three-term relation Instruction Memory Structure Learning Outcome. In other words, the suggestion is made that the effects of instruction may be explained by taking into account the processing of various forms of instruction by the learner, the first results of which are the acquisition of particular kinds of new memory structures. The latter structures, in turn, are the antecedents that enable the human learner to display retention and transfer in terms of new performances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Plans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Gagne, R. M. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042650 · Cited by 442
Reasoning in humans. I. On direction
Maier, N. R. F. (1930) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0073232 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Cognitive Conceptions of Learning
Shuell, T. J. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170340 · Cited by 1,116
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690701749305 · Cited by 732
Learning science: A generative process
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730670406 · Cited by 694
Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1981) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730650308 · Cited by 320
Self-citationTowards a learning progression of energy
Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21061 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Gagné, R. M., White, R. T., & Gagne, R. M.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135098038
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memory Structures and Learning Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170081
- The paper
- Gagné, R. M., White, R. T., & Gagne, R. M. (1978). Memory Structures and Learning Outcomes. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.