Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 548

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic

Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T.·1974·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

Theories of instruction are prescriptive, in the sense that they set forth rules concerning or specifying the most effective way of achieving knowledge or mastering skills. Although there has been a great deal of debate concerning various aspects of the instructional situation, most educators seem to assume that there are no operational alternatives to the competitive goal structure in which students are expected to outperform their peers. There has been little recognition of the powerful effects the goal structure has upon student behavior, and the relevant social psychological research has never been fully reviewed. There are four possible goal structures which can be implemented in a learning situation: competitive, cooperative, individualistic, and no structure. Each type of goal structure has an implicit value foundation which is taught subtly, as an unconscious curriculum, to the student who interacts within it. There is a great deal of evidence that the process by which students learn (i.e., the way in which students interact and behave in learning situations) and the outcomes of learning are both largely determined by the goal structure implemented by educators. The purpose of this article is to present a review of the research on the use of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on learning processes and outcomes. Before beginning the review the authors wish to make their bias clear. We believe that cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures are all appropriate and effective under different conditions, that educators should use all three goal structures depending upon the specific instructional objectives, and that students should be taught the basic skills necessary to function in all three types of situations. There are some difficulties, however, with presenting a complete view of the conditions under which each type of goal structure should be used. There is little research comparing individualistic goal structures with cooperative and competitive goal structures and, therefore, the research on cooperation and competition dominates the review. Although there is a great deal of research comparing cooperative and competitive goal structures, this research has not clearly specified the conditions under which each is desirable. Much of the current literature on educational

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1170165

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 548

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
1974
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
213
ISSN
0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136826859
Cited by
548
References
5
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170165
The paper
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170165

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.