The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on Revision in Writing
Abstract
Views of revision and its role in writing have changed dramatically over the last two decades. This article first presents a historical perspective on revision and suggests a contemporary definition of revision. Next, it reviews research methods for examining revision. The evolving methods mirror the recent reconceptualization of revision by enabling investigation of the following: meaningful revision activity, not just editorial actions; the revision process as well as the revision products; and revision as it occurs at several points in writing. Findings from research on revision are synthesized, conclusions about the results are given, and limitations of the research are examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A cognitive process theory of writing
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc198115885 · Cited by 1,025
Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers
Sommers, N. (1980) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356588 · Cited by 749 · cited 7×
“Sommers (1980), for example, may have believed it was both.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
SELF-EFFICACY FOR READING AND WRITING: INFLUENCE OF MODELING, GOAL SETTING, AND SELF-EVALUATION
Schunk, D. H. (2003) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573560308219 · Cited by 876
The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development
Graham, S., & R. Harris, K. (2000) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3501_2 · Cited by 671
Zhang, Z. (. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439 · Cited by 256
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021950 · Cited by 246
Reflections on Research on Writing and Technology for Struggling Writers
MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.x · Cited by 156
Effects of a Reciprocal Peer Revision Strategy in Special Education Classrooms
MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S. S., & Graham, S. (1991) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1177/093889829100600403 · Cited by 149
(2004) · Cited by 128
Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment
Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9 · Cited by 116
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & Schafer, W. D. (1995) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.2307/1511234 · Cited by 99
Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays
Butler, J. A., & Britt, M. A. (2011) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088310387891 · Cited by 92
The Effect of Using Automated Essay Evaluation on ESL Undergraduate Students’ Writing Skill
Aluthman, E. S. (2016) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v6n5p54 · Cited by 45
Bouwer, R., & Dirkx, K. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101745 · Cited by 37
Effects of Fluency Training on the Application of Linguistic Operations in Writing
van Gelderen, A., & Oostdam, R. (2005) · L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature · doi:10.1007/s10674-005-0332-z · Cited by 36
The mediating effect of instruction on pair composition in L2 revision and writing
Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., Van den Bergh, H. H., & Sercu, L. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9318-5 · Cited by 32
Students' drafting strategies and text quality
Piolat, A., & Roussey, J.-Y. (1996) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00008-9 · Cited by 29
arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writing
Jiang, C., Xu, W., & Stevens, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.641 · Cited by 18
(2019) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, J.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164390622
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
