The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft
Abstract
Most researchers would agree that, to know what you're doing, you need to know how your model of knowing affects what you are do-ing. Your model, however, may not be the same as your colleague's. Thus, it is not surprising that the Educational Researcher over the past year has contained a good deal of impassioned argument at the paradigmatic level (Eisner, 1983;
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052001031 · Cited by 1,740
Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue
Smith, J. K. (1983) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x012003006 · Cited by 608
Cited by
Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466599162782 · Cited by 2,491
Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020) · School Leadership & Management · doi:10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 · Cited by 1,683
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/a:1014301607592 · Cited by 1,082
Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002 · Cited by 788
Explaining Compassion Organizing
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.1.59 · Cited by 714
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1984-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 20
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156814490
- Cited by
- 1,170
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 68.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1174243
- The paper
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
