The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compliant Cognition: The Misalliance of Management and Instructional Goals in Current School Reform
Abstract
We examine the social context of current school reform efforts, focusing specifically on the interrelated areas of management and instruction. We maintain that in order to reform schools significantly, we must consider the various constructions of students in the popular culture and educational community and their implication for school management policies. We believe that the intended modern school curriculum, which is designed to produce self-motivated, active learners, is seriously undermined by classroom management policies that encourage, if not demand, simple obedience. We advocate that a curriculum that seeks to promote problem solving and meaningful learning must be aligned with an authoritative management system that increasingly allows students to operate as self-regulated and risk-taking learners. We note, however, that the analysis of management systems is only a small part of a set of complex and interrelated factors (e.g., testing policies, in-service mandates, curriculum content) that should be considered in any attempt to change schools. Our review indicates that too many reforms (e.g., more homework) are undertaken for political rather than educational reasons; hence, most reforms are irrelevant or self-defeating because they are symbolic and expedient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Community Involvement and Disadvantaged Students: A Review
Nettles, S. M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061003379 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032583 · Cited by 1,553
Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x · Cited by 1,479
Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory
Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.272 · Cited by 587
Toward a Conception of Culturally Responsive Classroom Management
Weinstein, C. S., Tomlinson-Clarke, S., & Curran, M. (2004) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487103259812 · Cited by 568
The Best-Laid Plans: Modern Conceptions of Volition and Educational Research
CORNO, L. (1993) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x022002014 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160248275
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 56.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compliant Cognition: The Misalliance of Management and Instructional Goals in Current School Reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1177277
- The paper
- McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1992). Compliant Cognition: The Misalliance of Management and Instructional Goals in Current School Reform. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.