The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introduction to Statistical Quality Control
Abstract
Quality Improvement in the Modern Business Environment.STAISTICAL METHODS USEFUL IN QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.Modeling Process Quality.Inferences About Process Quality.BASIC METHODS OF STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL AND CAPABILITY ANALYSIS.Methods and Philosophy of Statistical Process Control.Control Charts for Variables.Control Charts for Attributes.Process and Measurement Systems System Capability Analysis.OTHER STATISTICAL PROCESS MONITORING AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES.Cumulative Sum and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Charts.Other Univariate SPC Techniques.Multivariate Process Monitoring and Control.Engineering Process Control and SPC.PROCESS DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT WITH DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS.Factorial and Fractional Factorial Designs for Process Design and Improvement.Process Optimization with Designed Experiments.ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING.Lot--by--Lot Acceptance Sampling for Attributes.Other Acceptance Sampling Techniques.Appendix.Bibliography.Answers to Selected Exercises.Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application
Riedel, K. S. (1994) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1994.10485821 · Cited by 3,518
Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y · Cited by 1,504
Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018 · Cited by 863
Magalhães, F., Cunha, A., & Caetano, E. (2012) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.011 · Cited by 655
Martinez-Luengo, M., Kolios, A., & Wang, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085 · Cited by 310
Measuring knowledge worker productivity: A taxonomy
Ramírez, Y. W., & Nembhard, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691930410567040 · Cited by 255
Kullaa, J. (2011) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.017 · Cited by 214
Nie, L., Wu, G., & Zhang, W. (2006) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.055 · Cited by 191
Detection and diagnosis of bearing and cutting tool faults using hidden Markov models
Boutros, T., & Liang, M. (2011) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.01.013 · Cited by 155
Quimby, W. F., Sowell, B. F., Bowman, J. G. P., Branine, M. E., Hubbert, M. E., & Sherwood, H. W. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a00-098 · Cited by 99
Lukas, J. M., Reneau, J. K., & Linn, J. G. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0926 · Cited by 83
Taxonomies for Reasoning About Cyber-physical Attacks in IoT-based Manufacturing Systems
Pan, Y., White, J., Schmidt, D., Elhabashy, A., Sturm, L., Camelio, J., & Williams, C. (2017) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2017.437 · Cited by 81
Theodorsson, E., Magnusson, B., & Leito, I. (2014) · Bioanalysis · doi:10.4155/bio.14.249 · Cited by 73
Artificial intelligence-based sampling planning system for dynamic manufacturing process
Lee, J. H. (2002) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0957-4174(01)00049-5 · Cited by 31
An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement
Gupta, A., Sharma, P., Jain, A., Xue, H., Malik, S. C., & Jha, P. C. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-019-03341-9 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauter, R. M., & Montgomery, D. C.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 232
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157202423
- Cited by
- 7,842
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 117.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
