A Comparative Assessment of a Natural and Created Estuarine Slough as Rearing Habitat for Juvenile Chinook and Coho Salmon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stomach fullness estimates (0.64% BW for steelhead; 1.05% BW for Chinook Salmon) are similar in magnitude to those from other estuaries but somewhat below those reported for marine waters.
“Limited data that are directly comparable indicate that our estimates (0.64% BW for steelhead; 1.05% BW for Chinook Salmon) are similar in magnitude to those from other estuaries (e.g., 0.4-1.9%BW; Miller and Simenstad 1997;Levings 2016;Miller et al. 2020) but somewhat below those reported for marine waters (0.9-2.0%BW; Weitkamp and Sturdevant 2008;Daly et al. 2011Daly et al. , 2014;;Beamish 2018)”
From Life in the Fast Lane: Feeding and Growth of Juvenile Steelhead and Chinook Salmon in <scp>Main‐Stem</scp> Habitats of the Columbia River Estuary (2022) · cites this paper as Miller and Simenstad 1997
Many studies have measured the growth of juvenile salmon (primarily subyearlings) in estuaries, with reported rates ranging between 0.2 and 2.0 mm/d.
“Many studies have measured the growth of juvenile salmon (primarily subyearlings) in estuaries, with reported rates ranging between 0.2 and 2.0 mm/d (Miller and Simenstad 1997;Goertler et al. 2016;Levings 2016;Moore et al. 2016;Chalifour et al. 2021).”
From Life in the Fast Lane: Feeding and Growth of Juvenile Steelhead and Chinook Salmon in <scp>Main‐Stem</scp> Habitats of the Columbia River Estuary (2022) · cites this paper as Miller and Simenstad 1997
Cites
JUVENILE PACIFIC SALMON IN ESTUARIES: THE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM
Healey, M. C. (1982) · Estuarine Comparisons · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50025-9 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Levings, C. D., McAllister, C. D., & Chang, B. D. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f86-172 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Magnusson, A., & Hilborn, R. (2003) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02803366 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Roegner, G. C., Dawley, E. W., Russell, M., Whiting, A., & Teel, D. J. (2010) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t09-082.1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Thom, R. M., Buenau, K. E., Weitkamp, L. A., Woodley, C. M., Borde, A. B., & Kropp, R. K. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1242 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Diefenderfer, H. L., Coleman, A. M., Borde, A. B., & Sinks, I. A. (2008) · Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology · doi:10.2478/v10104-009-0027-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Weitkamp, L. A., Beckman, B. R., Van Doornik, D. M., Munguia, A., Hunsicker, M., & Journey, M. (2022) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1002/tafs.10376 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miller, J. A., & Simenstad, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Miller, Jessica A.
- Venue
- Estuaries
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 792
- ISSN
- 0160-8347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070681056
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Estuaries (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, coho salmon, otolith growth rate, residence time, diet, forage availability, Chehalis River, mark-recapture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
