Cited by 176Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

JUVENILE PACIFIC SALMON IN ESTUARIES: THE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM

Healey, M.C.·1982·Estuarine Comparisons

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50025-9

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a more estuary-dependent species, juvenile Chinook are especially susceptible to estuarine modifications.

    “As a more estuary-dependent species, juvenile Chinook are especially susceptible to estuarine modifications [1,3].”
  • These later studies provide no information on the spatial-temporal distribution and genetic stock of origin of the smaller subyearling fish known to be estuarine dependent in other systems.

    “These later studies provide no information on the spatial-temporal distribution and genetic stock of origin of the smaller subyearling fish known to be estuarine dependent in other systems (Healey 1982).”
  • The interaction of juvenile salmon with wetland sites can include multiple visits to multiple sites, as well as both direct and indirect interactions with tidal wetlands as the salmon migrate through the lower LCRE.

    “Second, the interaction of juvenile salmon with these wetland sites can include multiple visits to multiple sites, as well as both direct and indirect interactions with tidal wetlands as the salmon migrate through the lower LCRE (Healey 1982, Levings et al. 1986, Maier and Simenstad 2009).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Birtwell, I. K. 1978. Studies on the relationship between juvenile chinook salmon and water quality in the industrialized estuary of the Somass River, pp. 58–78. In: B. G. Shepherd and R. M. Ginetz (eds.), Proceedings of the 1977 Northeast Pacific Chinook and Coho Salmon Workshop. Canada, Fish. Mar. Serv. Tech. Rep. 759. 164 pp.
  2. Healey, 1980, Utilization of the Nanaimo River estuary by juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Fish. Bull., 77, 653
  3. Healey, 1982, Coastwide distribution and ocean migration patterns of stream and ocean type chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
  4. Sibert, J. R. and B. A. Kask. 1978. Do fish have diets?, pp. 48–57. In: B. G. Shepherd and R. M. J. Genetz (eds.), Proceedings of the 1977 Northeast Pacific Chinook and Coho Salmon Workshop. Canada, Fish. Mar. Serv. Tech. Rep. 759. 164 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Healey, M. C.
Corresponding author
Healey, M.C.
Venue
Estuarine Comparisons
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1982
Pages
315-341
OpenAlex
W72729506
Cited by
176
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.98
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
Oncorhynchus, chum salmon, coho salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, pink salmon, sockeye salmon, diet, food webs, detritus feeding, tidal creeks, marshes, delta front, delta configuration, allochthonous carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review