The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: New Directions for Research
Abstract
We reviewed the literature on sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates in an effort to clarify terms and concepts, summarize recent information that supports or discredits three broadly defined hypotheses, and suggest directions for future research that should help resolve when and why the sexes segregate in these large mammals. The hypotheses discussed include those based on intersexual differences in energetics and security (reproductive-strategy hypothesis), body size dimorphism and dietary requirements (sexual dimorphism-body size hypothesis), and social mechanisms (social-factors hypothesis). These hypotheses represent ecological, physiological, and social perspectives and are not mutually exclusive. Most evidence reviewed supported the reproductive-strategy hypothesis. Less support was available for either the sexual dimorphism-body size hypothesis or the social-factors hypothesis. Nonetheless, most available evidence is provided by field studies that contend with many confounding variables. We suggest several areas of future study that may serve as critical tests and are likely to be productive in resolving why sexual segregation occurs in polygynous ungulates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Red Deer. Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes
Watson, A., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., & Albon, S. D. (1983) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4471 · Cited by 2,460
Sexual Dimorphism in Mammals: Avian Models and Unanswered Questions
Ralls, K. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283223 · Cited by 577
The Allometry of Food Intake in Grazing Ruminants
Illius, A. W., & Gordon, I. J. (1987) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4961 · Cited by 550
The George Reserve Deer Herd: Population Ecology of a K-Selected Species
Carpenter, L. H., & McCullough, D. R. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898086 · Cited by 428
Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use.
Beier, P., & McCullough, D. R. (1990) · Wildlife Monographs · Cited by 351
Festa-Bianchet, M. (1988) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00776423 · Cited by 341
CLUTTON‐BROCK, T. H., IASON, G. R., & GUINNESS, F. E. (1987) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb01534.x · Cited by 264
Cited by
Chapter 2 Sexual Segregation in Marine Fish, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals
Wearmouth, V. J., & Sims, D. W. (2008) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)00002-3 · Cited by 360
Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep
RUCKSTUHL, K. E. (1998) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0745 · Cited by 301
SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF MIGRATORY TREE BATS (LASIURUS AND LASIONYCTERIS) IN NORTH AMERICA
Cryan, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0579:sdomtb>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 299
SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN UNGULATES: A NEW APPROACH
Ruckstuhl, K., & Neuhaus, P. (2000) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853900502123 · Cited by 263
What drives fine‐scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose
Leblond, M., Dussault, C., & Ouellet, J. (2010) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06104.x · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Main, M. B., Weckerly, F. W., & Bleich, V. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-05-17
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 449-461
- ISSN
- 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1542
- OpenAlex
- W2144495120
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 20.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: New Directions for Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1382821
- The paper
- Main, M. B., Weckerly, F. W., & Bleich, V. C. (1996). Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: New Directions for Research. Journal of Mammalogy. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.