Cited by 98Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSocial Power and Status DynamicsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Social Class, Occupational Conditions, and Self-Esteem

Gecas, Viktor, Seff, Monica A.·1989·Sociological Perspectives

Abstract

This study is an attempt at further specification of the relationship between social class and self-esteem. We argue that the effects of social class on self-esteem are largely experienced through occupational conditions which affect the self-evaluation dimensions of self-efficacy and self-worth. We examine these relationships, with the use of path analysis, for a sample of working men. The path model considers the direct and indirect effects of social class (socioeconomic status and education) on occupational conditions (work complexity; control over work; degree of supervision and routinization), on dimensions of self-evaluation (self-efficacy and self-worth), and on general self-esteem. We found the direct effect of our social class indicators on general self-esteem to be small and insignificant. But occupational prestige was significantly related to occupational conditions, which in turn were significantly related to self-worth and self-efficacy. Education had a direct effect on self-efficacy and self-esteem and an indirect effect on self-esteem via self-efficacy and job complexity. Of the two dimensions of self-evaluation, self-efficacy had a substantially stronger effect than self-worth on general self-esteem. These findings support our expectation that the effects of social class on self-esteem are largely mediated by occupational conditions which affect primarily the efficacy dimension of self-evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1389122

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gecas, V., & Seff, M. A.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gecas, Viktor
Venue
Sociological Perspectives
Published
1989-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
353-364
ISSN
  • 0731-1214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8673
OpenAlex
W2079126366
Cited by
98
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social class, self-esteem, working conditions, self-efficacy, self-worth, socioeconomic status, occupational prestige, job complexity, job control, supervision, routinization, working men, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review