Cited by 56Personality Traits and PsychologyAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Separated Twins and the Genetics of Personality Differences: A Critique

Joseph, Jay·2001·The American Journal of Psychology

Abstract

This article discusses studies of separated twins, with special emphasis on the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (MISTRA), to determine whether they support the existence of an important genetic component in behavioral and personality differences. The methods and conclusions of the MISTRA team are discussed in the context of earlier studies of separated identical twins. I argue that volunteer-based studies are biased toward greater twin similarity. In addition, the MISTRA research team did not publish or share raw data and case history information. Reared-together and reared-apart monozygotic twins share important environmental similarities not controlled for by comparing personality correlations. I propose an alternative control group consisting of biologically unrelated pairs of strangers matched on all environmental factors common to pairs of separated monozygotic twins. I conclude that the evidence from studies of twins reared apart does not support the role of genetic factors in personality and behavioral differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1423378

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joseph, J.
Affiliations
Alliant University (US)
Corresponding author
Joseph, Jay
Venue
The American Journal of Psychology
Published
2001
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065932539
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
personality differences, behavioral genetics, monozygotic twins, twin similarity, data sharing, control group design
MeSH terms
Behavior, Child, Child Rearing, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Twins, Monozygotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review