Cited by 194Personality Traits and PsychologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorCognitive Abilities and Testing

A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality.

Turkheimer, Eric, Pettersson, Erik, Horn, Erin E.·2014·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

We review the genetically informed literature on the genetics of personality. Over the past century, quantitative genetic studies, using identical and fraternal twins, have demonstrated that differences in human personality are substantially heritable. We focus on more contemporary questions to which that basic observation has led. We examine whether differences in the heritability of personality are replicable across different traits, samples, and studies; how the heritability of personality relates to its reliability; and how behavior genetics can be employed in studies of validity, and we discuss the stability of personality in genetic and environmental variance. The appropriate null hypothesis in behavior genetics is not that genetic or environmental influence on personality is zero. Instead, we offer a phenotypic null hypothesis, which states that genetic variance is not an independent mechanism of individual differences in personality but rather a reflection of processes that are best conceptualized at the phenotypic level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143752

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The twin findings on Big Five factor concordance have been confirmed in several other publications.

    “These findings have since then been confirmed in several other publications (Briley & Tucker-Drob, 2014;Turkheimer et al., 2014).”

    From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Turkheimer et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turkheimer, E., Pettersson, E., & Horn, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2014-01-03
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
515-540
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2145597092
Cited by
194
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
personality genetics, heritability, behavioral genetics, twin studies, reliability statistics, validity, genetic variance, environmental variance, individual differences
MeSH terms
Humans, Individuality, Personality, Phenotype, Social Environment, Twins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review