The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire
Abstract
Student Writing presents an accessible and thought-provoking study of academic writing practices. Informed by 'composition' research from the US and 'academic literacies studies'from the UK, the book challenges current official discourse on writing as a 'skill'. Lillis argues for an approach which sees student writing as social practice. The book draws extensively on a three-year study with ten non-traditional students in higher education and their experience of academic writing. Using case-study material - including literacy history interviews, extended discussions with students about their writing of discipline specific essays, and extracts from essays - Lillis identifies the following as three significant dimensions to academic writing: Access to higher education and to its language and literacy representational resources Regulation of meaning making in academic writing rrent Desire for participation in higher education and for choices over ways of meaning in academic writing. Student Writing: access, regulation, desire raises questions about why academics write as they do, who benefits from such writing, which meanings are valued and how, on what terms 'outsiders' get to be 'insiders' and at what costs. Theresa M. Lillis is Lecturer in language and education at the Centre for Language and Communications at the Open University.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588284 · Cited by 428
Self-citationPerceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002 · Cited by 352
‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about
Wingate, U. (2012) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 · Cited by 351
Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.525630 · Cited by 277
Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation
Hyland, K. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000036 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Martins, D., & Lillis, T. M.
- Venue
- College Composition and Communication
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153
- ISSN
- 0010-096X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1568984948
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 236.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1512109
- The paper
- Martins, D., & Lillis, T. M. (2002). Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire. College Composition and Communication. https://doi.org/10.2307/1512109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.