The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies writing pedagogy
Abstract
This article is a review of two dominant approaches to academic writing instruction in higher education, English for Academic Purposes (EAP), which is used internationally, and Academic Literacies, which has become an influential model in the UK. The review was driven by a concern that Academic Literacies has been mainly focused on the situations of ‘non-traditional’ students, and has not sufficiently acknowledged the theoretical and pedagogical potential of EAP for developing a mainstream instructional model. Another concern was that EAP is too focused on the needs of non-native speakers of English and has, therefore, failed to make an impact on mainstream writing instruction. The aim of this article is to critically examine both approaches and to identify shared principles that can be used for developing relevant writing support programmes for students from all backgrounds at UK universities and elsewhere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Introduction to Functional Grammar
Matthiessen, C., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) · Language · doi:10.2307/414947 · Cited by 9,880
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Castro, C. D., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415759 · Cited by 5,989
Literacy in Theory and Practice
Searle-Chatterjee, M., & Street, B. V. (1987) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802515 · Cited by 4,966
Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective
Meyer, C. F., Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1987) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586740 · Cited by 4,135
(1978) · Cited by 2,948
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,604
Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing
Sun, J., & Hyland, K. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587657 · Cited by 1,970
Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause
Sobhie, M. (2004) · DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/s0102-44502004000100011 · Cited by 1,688
Cited by
Wingate, U. (2012) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006 · Cited by 260
Self-citationIntegrating written communication skills: Working towards a whole of course approach
Harris, A. (2016) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Wingate, U., & Tribble, C.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481-495
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2058555645
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 171.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies writing pedagogy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630
- The paper
- Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012). The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.