The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LEADERSHIP IN THE SHAPING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATION AGENDAS: HOW THINGS HAPPEN IN A (NOT QUITE) JOINED-UP WORLD.
Abstract
This article contributes to the theory if collaboration in social settings and is based on data collected during action research interventions in a number of public and community interorganizational collaborations. We conceptualize leadership in collaborations as stemming from three leadership media - structures, processes, and participants - and argue that none of these is wholly within the control of the members of a collaboration. Leadership activities that participants undertake in order to move a collaborative agenda forward are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“…together with the closeness of the researcher to the system being studied, increases the opportunity for gaining data about participants' "theories in use" (Argyris & Schon, 1978) or their expressions of "inner experiences" (Wittgenstein, 1968) rather then their "espoused theories" or "utterances."”
BackgroundAction Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
The question of participation: Toward Authentic public participation in public administration
King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O. (1998) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/977561 · Cited by 702
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes
Purdy, J. M. (2012) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x · Cited by 510
The Challenge of Collaborative Governance
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000) · Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory · doi:10.1080/14719030000000021 · Cited by 455
Self-citationJurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism, and the Design of Democratic Governance
SKELCHER, C. (2005) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00267.x · Cited by 351
Building bridges from the margins: The work of leadership in social change organizations
Ospina, S., & Foldy, E. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.008 · Cited by 306
The Routledge Companion to Leadership
(2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315739854 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Huxham, C., & Vangen, S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1159-1175
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2146622136
- Cited by
- 856
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 34.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
