The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis
Abstract
Limit pricing involves charging prices below the monopoly price to make new entry appear unattractive.If the entrant is a rational decision maker with complete information, pre-entry prices will not influence its entry decision, so the established firm has no incentive to practice limit pricing.However, if the established firm has private, payoff relevant information (e.g., about costs), then prices can signal that information, so limit pricing can arise in equilibrium.The probability that entry actually occurs in such an equilibrium, however, can be lower, the same, or even higher than in a regime of complete information (where no limit pricing would occur).'Much of the work reported here first appeared in [11].This work has been presented at a large number of conferences, meetings, and seminars, and we would like to thank our audiences at each of these events for their comments.We are particularly indebted to Eric Maskin, Roger Myerson, Steve Salop, Robert Wilson, and two referees for their helpful suggestions, to David Besanko for his excellent research assistance,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategic information transmission
Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913390 · Cited by 4,293
Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications
Milgrom, P. R. (1981) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003562 · Cited by 3,123
Self-citationFrictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers
Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.4.563.12061 · Cited by 2,498
The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information
Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911307 · Cited by 2,395
Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure
Bhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. R. (1983) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297419 · Cited by 721
(1987) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036932 · Cited by 638
Information Manipulation, Coordination, and Regime Change*
Edmond, C. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt020 · Cited by 433
Incentive Compatibility in Signaling Games with a Continuum of Types
Mailath, G. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913560 · Cited by 260
Voluntary financial disclosure in an entry game with continua of types*
FELTHAM, G. A., & XIE, J. Z. (1992) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1992.tb00869.x · Cited by 198
The Market Impacts of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in Developing Countries: Evidence from India
Duggan, M., Garthwaite, C., & Goyal, A. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141301 · Cited by 183
Strategic Information Transmission in Peer-to-Peer Lending Markets
Caldieraro, F., Zhang, J. Z., Cunha, M., & Shulman, J. D. (2018) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.16.0113 · Cited by 101
Standardization and the costs of assessing quality
Jones, P., & Hudson, J. (1996) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(95)00021-6 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 443
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140116864
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.