The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time Series Regression with a Unit Root
Abstract
This paper studies the random walk in a general time series setting that allows for weakly dependent and heterogeneously distributed innovations. It is shown that simple least squares regression consistently estimates a unit root under very general conditions in spite of the presence of autocorrelated errors. The limiting distribution of the standardized estimator and the associated regression t-statistic are found using functional central limit theory. New tests of the random walk hypothesis are developed which permit a wide class of dependent and heterogeneous innovation sequences. A new limiting distribution theory is constructed based on the concept of continuous data recording. This theory, together with an asymptotic expansion that is developed in the paper for the unit root case, explain many of the interesting experimental results recently reported in Evans and Savin (1981, 1984).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7 · Cited by 12,849
Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y · Cited by 12,633
Self-citationThe Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis
Perron, P. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913712 · Cited by 7,732
Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes
Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8 · Cited by 6,108
Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy
Piccirillo, M. L., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002 · Cited by 160
A Clinician’s Primer for Idiographic Research: Considerations and Recommendations
Piccirillo, M. L., Beck, E. D., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2019) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2019.02.002 · Cited by 90
ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE WITH NEAR UNIT ROOTS
Phillips, P. C. B. (2023) · Econometric Theory · doi:10.1017/s0266466622000342 · Cited by 44
Self-citationOyadeyi, O. O. (2024) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-024-02201-7 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, P. C. B.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124120883
- Cited by
- 2,814
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 145.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.