Cited by 90Mental Health Research TopicsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

A Clinician’s Primer for Idiographic Research: Considerations and Recommendations

Open access
Piccirillo, Marilyn L., Beck, Emorie D., Rodebaugh, Thomas L.·2019·Behavior Therapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Theorists and clinicians have long noted the need for idiographic (i.e., individual-level) designs within clinical psychology. Results from idiographic work may provide a possible resolution of the therapist's dilemma-the problem of treating an individual using information gathered via group-level research. Due to advances in data collection and time series methodology, there has been increasing interest in using idiographic designs to answer clinical questions. Although time series methods have been well-studied outside the field of clinical psychology, there is limited direction on how clinicians can use such models to inform their clinical practice. In this primer, we collate decades of published and word-of-mouth information on idiographic designs, measurement, and modeling. We aim to provide an initial guide on the theoretical and practical considerations that we urge interested clinicians to consider before conducting idiographic work of their own.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2019.02.002

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allport GW (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, England: Holt. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1938-01964-000.
  2. Beck J (2011). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Basics and Beyond (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piccirillo, M. L., Beck, E. D., & Rodebaugh, T. L.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Piccirillo, Marilyn L.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
938-951
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2919463216
Cited by
90
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH 115641)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (25785)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
idiographic research, time series models, clinical psychology research, measurement, modeling
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Physicians, Research Design, Research Personnel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review