The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fish Predation on Bosmina longirostris: Body-Size Selection Versus Visibility Selection
Abstract
We examine the effects of fish predation on a population of Bosmina longirostris (O. F. Muller), a smaller, limnetic cladoceran, in Gatun Lake, Panama. We test the relative importance of two different modes of predator selection: body—size selection, in which fish choose the largest of otherwise identically appearing individuals, and visibility selection, in which fish choose individuals having the greatest amount of body pigmentation. In B. longirostris, this pigmentation is most heavily concentrated in the large, black, compound eye of these otherwise transparent animals. We find that these predators are feeding according to visibility selection and that body—size selection is of negligible importance under these circumstances. We then discuss the general applicability of these findings, and the evolutionary consequences for prey populations under this type of selective pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, E. G. (1957) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,896
Brooks, J. L., & Dodson, S. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3692.28 · Cited by 3,280
Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes
Farris, D. A., Ivlev, V. S., & Scott, D. (1962) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1439522 · Cited by 1,751
AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1
Hall, D. J., Cooper, W. E., & Werner, E. E. (1970) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1970.15.6.0839 · Cited by 637
Hrbáček, J., Dvořakova, M., Kořínek, V., & Procházkóva, L. (1961) · SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010 · doi:10.1080/03680770.1959.11899269 · Cited by 459
EFFECTS OF ALEWIFE PREDATION ON ZOOPLANKTON POPULATIONS IN LAKE MICHIGAN1
Wells, L. (1970) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1970.15.4.0556 · Cited by 301
COMPLEMENTARY FEEDING NICHES SUSTAINED BY SIZE‐SELECTIVE PREDATION1
Dodson, S. I. (1970) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1970.15.1.0131 · Cited by 265
The Effects of Prey Size Selection By Lake Planktivores
Brooks, L. J. (1968) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/17.3.273 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem
Bailey, K. M., & Houde, E. D. (1989) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60187-x · Cited by 1,051
Predation, competition, and zooplankton community structure: An experimental study1,2
Lynch, M. (1979) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1979.24.2.0253 · Cited by 355
PEARRE, S. (2003) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s146479310200595x · Cited by 353
Hidden in Plain Sight: The Ecology and Physiology of Organismal Transparency
Johnsen, S. (2001) · The Biological Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1543609 · Cited by 265
Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs
Barnett, J. B., Michalis, C., Anderson, H. M., McEwen, B. L., Yeager, J., Pruitt, J. N., Scott-Samuel, N. E., & Cuthill, I. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1919417117 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaret, T. M., & Kerfoot, W. C.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 232-237
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078782738
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fish Predation on Bosmina longirostris: Body-Size Selection Versus Visibility Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1935317
- The paper
- Zaret, T. M., & Kerfoot, W. C. (1975). Fish Predation on Bosmina longirostris: Body-Size Selection Versus Visibility Selection. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.