The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we consider the basic self-selection model for the effects of education, training, unions, and other activities on wages. We show that past models have ignored 'heterogeneity of rewards' to the activity--i.e., differences across individuals in the rate of return to the activity--as a source of selection bias. We model such heterogeneity, show how its presence can be tested, and draw out its implications for the wage and welfare gains to the activity. An empirical application provides strong support for such heterogeneity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03004-7 · Cited by 1,628
Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Econometric Policy Evaluation1
Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00594.x · Cited by 1,220
Using matching, instrumental variables and control functions to estimate economic choice models
Heckman, J., & Navarro-Lozano, S. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023660 · Cited by 768
Estimating Marginal Returns to Education
Carneiro, P., Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.6.2754 · Cited by 612
Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption
(2011) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta7749 · Cited by 543
Juvenile incarceration, human capital, and future crime: Evidence from randomly assigned judges
Aizer, A., & Doyle, J. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv003 · Cited by 541
Zhao, Z. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023705 · Cited by 389
Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance
Cornelissen, T., Dustmann, C., Raute, A., & Schönberg, U. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/699979 · Cited by 315
Women's Empowerment in Action: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial in Africa
Bandiera, O., Buehren, N., Burgess, R., Goldstein, M., Gulesci, S., Rasul, I., & Sulaiman, M. (2020) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20170416 · Cited by 311
The Long‐Run Educational Cost of World War II
Ichino, A., & Winter‐Ebmer, R. (2004) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/380403 · Cited by 307
Kang, H., Zhang, A., Cai, T. T., & Small, D. S. (2016) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.994705 · Cited by 265
Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)
Imbens, G. W. (2010) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.399 · Cited by 278
Does early child care affect children's development?
Felfe, C., & Lalive, R. (2018) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.014 · Cited by 232
New Developments in Econometric Methods for Labor Market Analysis
(1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03005-9 · Cited by 152
Self-citationAgan, A., Doleac, J. L., & Harvey, A. (2021) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3814854 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjorklund, A., & Moffitt, R.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W579986423
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
