The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relative Importance of Fuels and Weather on Fire Behavior in Subalpine Forests
Abstract
Surface fire intensity (kilowatts per metre) and crown fire initiation were predicted using Rothermel's 1972 and Van Wagner's 1977 fire models with fuel data from 47 upland subalpine conifer stands varying in age from 22—258 yr and 35 yr of daily weather data (fuel moisture and wind speeds). Rothermel's intensity model was divided into a fuel component variable and weather component variable, which were then used to examine the relative roles of fuel and weather on surface fire intensity (kilowatts per metre). Similar variables were defined in the crown fire initiation model of Van Wagner. Both surface fire intensity and crown fire initiation were strongly related to the weather components and weakly related to the fuel components, due to much greater variability in weather than fuel, and stronger relationship to the fire behavior mechanisms for weather than for fuel. Fire intensity was correlated to annual area burned; large area burned years had higher fire intensity predictions than smaller area burned years. The reason for this difference was attributed directly to the weather variable frequency distribution, which was shifted towards more extreme values in years in which large areas burned. During extreme weather conditions, the relative importance of fuels diminishes since all stands achieve the threshold required to permit crown fire development. This is important since most of the area burned in subalpine forests has historically occurred during very extreme weather (i.e., drought coupled to high winds). The fire behavior relationships predicted in the models support the concept that forest fire behavior is determined primarily by weather variation among years rather than fuel variation associated with stand age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels
Rothermel, R. C. (1972) · doi:10.2737/int-rp-115 · Cited by 2,247
Fire-Southern Oscillation Relations in the Southwestern United States
Swetnam, T. W., & Betancourt, J. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.249.4972.1017 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013
Jolly, W. M., Cochrane, M. A., Freeborn, P. H., Holden, Z. A., Brown, T. J., Williamson, G. J., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8537 · Cited by 2,200
The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests
SCHOENNAGEL, T., VEBLEN, T. T., & ROMME, W. H. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0661:tioffa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 776
What limits fire? An examination of drivers of burnt area in Southern Africa
ARCHIBALD, S., ROY, D. P., Van WILGEN, B. W., & SCHOLES, R. J. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01754.x · Cited by 773
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.
Fernandes, P. M., & Botelho, H. S. (2003) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf02042 · Cited by 718
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W. (2001) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00175.x · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Bessie, W. C., & Johnson, E. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 747-762
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2079163277
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relative Importance of Fuels and Weather on Fire Behavior in Subalpine Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939341
- The paper
- Bessie, W. C., & Johnson, E. A. (1995). The Relative Importance of Fuels and Weather on Fire Behavior in Subalpine Forests. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.