The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants
Abstract
The effects of inter— and intraspecific interference on size hierarchies (size inequalities) were investigated in populations of the annual plants Trifolium incarnatum and Lolium multiflorum. Variables experimentally manipulated included plant density, species proportions, soil fertility, and spatial pattern of plantings. Densities were below those for extensive density—dependent mortality. Size inequality always increased with increasing density. Plants grown individually showed very low inequality, while plants grown at the highest density had the most developed hierarchies. Size inequality usually increased with an increase in productivity when interference was occurring. When dominant in mixtures, Lolium showed less size inequality than in monoculture, while the suppressed species, Trifolium, usually displayed an increase in inequality. Spatial pattern appeared to be less important than other factors in causing size inequalities; plants sown in a uniform spatial pattern showed significantly lower size inequality than plants sown in a random pattern in only one out of four cases. Inequality in reproductive output of Trifolium, as estimated by dry mass of flower heads, was always greater than inequality in plant in dry mass. The results support a model of plant interference in which large plants are able to usurp resources and suppress the growth of smaller individuals more than they themselves are suppressed. While interference decreases mean plant mass, it increases both relative variation in plant mass and the concentration of mass within a small fraction of the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods
EFRON, B. (1981) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.589 · Cited by 1,399
Cited by
Light-Gap Disturbances, Recruitment Limitation, and Tree Diversity in a Neotropical Forest
Hubbell, S. P., Foster, R. B., O'Brien, S. T., Harms, K. E., Condit, R., Wechsler, B., Wright, S. J., & de Lao, S. L. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5401.554 · Cited by 1,537
Root competition: beyond resource depletion
SCHENK, H. J. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01124.x · Cited by 587
The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations
Weiner, J., & Solbrig, O. T. (1984) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379630 · Cited by 555
Self-citationCrop physiology of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)
van der Werf, H. (2024) · doi:10.18174/202103 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiner, J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 743-752
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2050980973
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1940535
- The paper
- Weiner, J. (1985). Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.