The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) Coloniality
Abstract
We studied the advantages and disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) coloniality in 1972 and 1973 by examining 54 colonies, ranging in size from 2 to 451 active nests, near Ann Arbor, Michigan USA. Four disadvantages were investigated: (1) increased competition for nest burrows and nest building materials, (2) increased competition for mates and matings, (3) increased possibilities of misdirected parental care because of either brood parasitism or the mixing up of unrelated young, and (4) increased transmission of ectoparasites. Physical interference in reproductive functions and the possibility of intraspecific killing of offspring were also considered. The intensity of the various forms of competition increased with increasing colony size, though not always directly. Flea infestation also increased with increasing colony size. Intraspecific brood parasitism was not observed, and parent Bank Swallows began discriminating between their own and unrelated offspring at the time when the young first began to mix. Three hypotheses to explain the maintenance of coloniality were tested: (1) shortage of suitable nesting habitats, (2) advantages associated with social foraging, and (3) reduced predation on adults, young, or eggs. Shortage of suitable habitat could not be demonstrated. Parents did not appear to feed in groups, and survivorship of nestlings during cold weather and weight of nestlings at 10 days of age both suggested that competition for food increased with increasing colony size. Although there was no relationship between colony size and amount of nocturnal predation, adult birds mobbed diurnal predators. Using a stuffed weasel, we studied such mobbing responses. Our data suggest that diurnal predators at larger colonies are (1) detected more quickly, (2) mobbed by greater numbers of birds, and (3) subjected to more vocal commotion than are predators at smaller colonies. Further, we demonstrated that mobbing is at least sometimes effective in deterring avian predators. We suggest that reduced predation on eggs and young, resulting from both group defense and "selfish herd" effects, is an important advantage of Bank Swallow coloniality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Cited by
The Ecology of Brood Parasitism in Birds
Payne, R. B. (1977) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.000245 · Cited by 531
THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF COLONIALITY IN BIRDS
Wittenberger, J. F., & Hunt, G. L. (1985) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249408-6.50010-8 · Cited by 499
Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds
YOM‐TOV, Y. (1980) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1980.tb00689.x · Cited by 403
Curio, E., Ernst, U., & Vieth, W. (1978) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb00255.x · Cited by 354
Sexual Selection, Lek and Arena Behavior, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Birds
Payne, R. B. (1984) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40166729 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoogland, J. L., & Sherman, P. W.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-58
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2168414965
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advantages and Disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) Coloniality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1942393
- The paper
- Hoogland, J. L., & Sherman, P. W. (1976). Advantages and Disadvantages of Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) Coloniality. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.